go green
both reading and the lecture are about going green.The author thinks that going green has many advantages, while the lecturer have many remarks on that.
First in the passage the author claims that going green can lower enviromental pollution by reducing amount of waste that can irreversibly damage the environment. On the other hand, the professor explains that reducing the amount of waste is not an obvious thing to do since it is not something that one person can do.He also mentions that without convincing all companies and individual to protect the environment , we cannot reach the goal of an environment with less polluants,
Second, the passage points out that going green can improve companies` sales , because customers prefer company that demonstrates eco-friendly image . However, the professor thinks exactly the opposite. He says eventhough it may seems appealing to use eco-freindly stroyers in a coffe shop, it will lead to increase the cost which will make the coffe shop lose customers.
Finally, the auther asserts that going green enables people to save money and uses installation of solar pannels instead of using electricity as an example to illustrate that point. The professor despute this idea by pointing out that this is not practical for the big industries that use tremendous amount of energy. He explains that these pannels cost a lot of money as well as the money needed for periodic maintanace .
to sum up the lecturer disputes every single claim made by the author.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Both
both reading and the lecture are about going...
^^^^
Line 1, column 52, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...g and the lecture are about going green.The author thinks that going green has many...
^^^
Line 3, column 319, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: He
...is not something that one person can do.He also mentions that without convincing a...
^^
Line 3, column 415, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nd individual to protect the environment , we cannot reach the goal of an environm...
^^
Line 5, column 82, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... green can improve companies' sales , because customers prefer company that d...
^^
Line 5, column 154, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...any that demonstrates eco-friendly image . However, the professor thinks exactly t...
^^
Line 8, column 421, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...the money needed for periodic maintanace . to sum up the lecturer disputes ever...
^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...ney needed for periodic maintanace . to sum up the lecturer disputes every sing...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, may, second, so, well, while, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1274.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 245.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74375088164 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620408163265 0.540411800872 115% => OK
syllable_count: 387.9 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 117.276606658 49.2860985944 238% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 141.555555556 110.228320801 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2222222222 21.698381199 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2222222222 7.06452816374 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29032099736 0.272083759551 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110965145739 0.0996497079465 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143134834008 0.0662205650399 216% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159531970211 0.162205337803 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.138785557245 0.0443174109184 313% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.3589403974 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.8541721854 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.7273730684 177% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.