hails
Both the reading and listening discuss whether the cloud seeding will be beneficial for the US farmer to get rid of hail that damage a lot of crops. The former argues that the cloud seeding may have great impact on reducing the amount of hail but the latter contradicts each of the points made by the reading.
First of all, the reading contends that, some laboratory experiments confirm that the silver iodide help the cloud to reduce the hail in the precipitation and allow the cloud to precipitate only the snow and the rain. In contrast, the lecturer argues that although it reduce the hail formation it also block all kinds of precipitation. Moreover, it can creat further problem by creating the drough problem to the farmer by reducing the amount of rain and snow that will damage more due to the lack of water.
Secondly, some asian coutries sucessfully imply cloud seeding to control precipitation in cities and hope that this will also be applicable to US farmers. However, the professor rebuts that, this experiments are done in the urban and cities where the environmental polutions are high and the pollutant particle help the clound formation nucli that help the rain system. Also added that, this will not applicable to the US farmer because the fram lands are not have the pollutant particle to have cloud formation nuclei.
Finally, the text claims that, some local studies found that cloud seeding areas are less hail damaged areas compare to the other areas and predicts that it will applicable to the all areas damaged by hail. On the other hand, the listening counters that, the hails are not only damage the local areas but also the nearby areas are also damage haighly by the hail. He further argues that, the result is not artificially ycontrolable since it is a natural reason since the pattern damage several similar natarul areas damage by the hails.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ach of the points made by the reading. First of all, the reading contends that,...
^^^
Line 3, column 159, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reduce the hail in the precipitation and allow the cloud to precipitate only the ...
^^
Line 3, column 270, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'reduces'?
Suggestion: reduces
...t, the lecturer argues that although it reduce the hail formation it also block all ki...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 304, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'blocks'?
Suggestion: blocks
...gh it reduce the hail formation it also block all kinds of precipitation. Moreover, i...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 371, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...mation nucli that help the rain system. Also added that, this will not applicable to...
^^^^
Line 5, column 461, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...S farmer because the fram lands are not have the pollutant particle to have cloud fo...
^^^^
Line 7, column 337, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'damaged'.
Suggestion: damaged
...reas but also the nearby areas are also damage haighly by the hail. He further argues ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, in contrast, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1565.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 322.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8602484472 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43480835644 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.453416149068 0.540411800872 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 483.3 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 21.2450331126 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 29.8857327967 49.2860985944 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.272727273 110.228320801 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.2727272727 21.698381199 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06452816374 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238122233425 0.272083759551 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11050098198 0.0996497079465 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107615199208 0.0662205650399 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155745435522 0.162205337803 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0934109617241 0.0443174109184 211% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.3589403974 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 53.8541721854 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.5 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.498013245 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.