integrated 42
Both the reading and the lecture discuss buildings' glasses which are very dangerous for wild birds. In the reading section, the writer proposes three possible solution to decline the danger of buldings' glasses for birds and provides three reasons for support; however, in the lecture the professor casts doubts on reading points by indicating that theses solutions are not effective.
First of all, the writer claims that one-way glasses can be useful for both occupants and birds because people can see outside, but birds cannot see inside, so birds do not fly toward glasses; in contrast, the professor rejects this notion by stating that one-way glasses sometimes are as same as mirror. Since birds cannot detect mirrors, they may fly through them when they see the image of tree or water in one-way glasses.
Moreover, the reading passage holds the view that using colorful designs on regular glass can be beneficial because birds can detect stripes on windows and avoid do not fly through the glass; conversely, the lecturer underlines the fact that strips are too thin to be detectable for birds and also, using thick strips hampers people from watching outside.
In addition, the writer mentions that using magnetic field can help birds to navigatr in the right direction during flying; on the contrary, the professor indicates magnetic feild can work just for long destinations forexample when birds migrate from cold city to warm city, but if they just fly from one side of a city to another part of it, birds' ability to sense magnetic fields will not work, so birds in short distances use their eyes to navigate.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 77, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t using magnetic field can help birds to navigatr in the right direction during f...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'conversely', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'in addition', 'in contrast', 'in short', 'first of all', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.268456375839 0.261695866417 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.147651006711 0.158904122519 93% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0872483221477 0.0723426182421 121% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0637583892617 0.0435111971325 147% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0201342281879 0.0277247811725 73% => OK
Prepositions: 0.144295302013 0.128828473217 112% => OK
Participles: 0.0268456375839 0.0370669169778 72% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.31302038818 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0234899328859 0.0208969081088 112% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0805369127517 0.128158765124 63% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0335570469799 0.0158828679856 211% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.010067114094 0.0114777025283 88% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1625.0 1645.83664459 99% => OK
No of words: 271.0 271.125827815 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.9963099631 6.08160592843 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.04852973271 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.376383763838 0.374372842146 101% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.291512915129 0.287516216867 101% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.166051660517 0.187439937562 89% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0885608856089 0.113142543107 78% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31302038818 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571955719557 0.539623497131 106% => OK
Word variations: 58.9301047753 53.8517498576 109% => OK
How many sentences: 6.0 13.0529801325 46% => More sentences wanted.
Sentence length: 45.1666666667 21.7502111507 208% => Sentence lengths are too long.
Sentence length SD: 124.364719006 49.3711431718 252% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 270.833333333 132.220823453 205% => Less chars per sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 45.1666666667 21.7502111507 208% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.33333333333 0.878197800319 266% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 74.3179581796 50.5018328374 147% => OK
Elegance: 1.89855072464 1.90840788429 99% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.549887131256 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.213665647026 0.142949733639 149% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0628837603832 0.0787303798458 80% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.854398512533 0.631733273073 135% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.143074550123 0.139662658121 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.266732575781 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.103435571967 0% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.274328631572 0.414875509568 66% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0154034800646 0.0530846634433 29% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.40443939384 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0528353158467 0% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.26048565121 23% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 2.0 3.49668874172 57% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 6.0 10.2958057395 58% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.