The lecture introduces the emergence of drug-resistant strains of bacteria in order to cast doubt on the idea presented by the reading passage that antibiotics are wonder drugs which can manage all bacterial infections efficiently.
The lecturer states that drug-resistant bacteria have been developing since 1950, Thus; it is no longer safe to stay in hospitals because hospital infections put you in danger of drug-resistance diseases. It refutes the claim in the passage that antibiotics can eradicate hospital acquired infections quickly and effectively.
Moreover, he explains that bacterial colonies which are attacked by chemical drugs usually are not destroyed completely. In fact, some very resistant bacteria can escape the death via developing neutralizing enzymes or other bacterial weapons. Therefore, remaining cells produce new colonies that can effectively fight against the antibiotics. This undermines the claimed efficacy of antibiotics by the passage, as powerful weapons against any infectious microorganism.
Finally, the lecturer gives examples of diseases, formerly known as curable with antibiotics, which are no longer sensitive to conventional drugs. Today, pneumonia patients will die despite large doses of penicillin, and there are patients with tuberculosis whose diseases are resistant to any known antibiotics. This negates the passage that antibiotics are wonder drugs because they can save pneumonia and tuberculosis patients from death.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, moreover, so, therefore, thus, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1270.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 212.0 270.72406181 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.99056603774 5.08290768461 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13009996804 2.5805825403 121% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.622641509434 0.540411800872 115% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.55342163355 122% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8145701974 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 110.228320801 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 7.06452816374 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.071605246754 0.272083759551 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0340205266354 0.0996497079465 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425494952962 0.0662205650399 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0479241625279 0.162205337803 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00919484048896 0.0443174109184 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.3589403974 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.8541721854 46% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.0289183223 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.46 12.2367328918 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.42419426049 113% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.7273730684 144% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.