integrated essay TPO13
The reading passage mainly states that private collectors of rare and important fossils are becoming more and more and this way has not a good result for both scientists and the general public. On the other hand, the professor refutes the author’s view and he believes that even though has negative impacts, but these reasons are not acceptable.
First of all, the article asserts that by increasing public collectors, people don’t access to see and which significant fossils in the public place such as museums where they don’t allow to view them. In contrast, in the listening, the speaker points out that there are more locations available where people can go there easily and use them such as library and public school that they have not limited.
In addition, the text claims that scientists need to access more to fossils to consider them and uncover important issues on them, however, by enhance private collectors, they will buy them to another people, experts cant not explore what happened in the past such as extinct animals. On the contrary, the professor argues that at the end of the process of buying and selling the fossils, it will be available for scientist and this is not problem.
Finally, the reading saying that people who are not familiar in this method, they start to discover digging materials that might not be valuable and worthy or they miss and left some important parts of fossils, However, the lecturer discusses that this way is not complex and everybody can find them, therefore, it does not need expert people and don’t damage to fossils. He also believes that most of fossils are in a same locations and they don’t miss some of them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading passage mainly states that p...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 179, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...good result for both scientists and the general public. On the other hand, the professor refut...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 199, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'viewing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: viewing
... as museums where they don't allow to view them. In contrast, in the listening, th...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 218, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ill buy them to another people, experts cant not explore what happened in the past s...
^^^^
Line 6, column 399, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the fossils') or simply say ''most fossils''.
Suggestion: most of the fossils; most fossils
...amage to fossils. He also believes that most of fossils are in a same locations and they don&ap...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, so, therefore, in addition, in contrast, such as, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 7.30242825607 246% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1418.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 286.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95804195804 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47079869733 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527972027972 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 21.2450331126 165% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.5502985538 49.2860985944 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 177.25 110.228320801 161% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.75 21.698381199 165% => OK
Discourse Markers: 17.25 7.06452816374 244% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321972306521 0.272083759551 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142576960513 0.0996497079465 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0791456007549 0.0662205650399 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195163249724 0.162205337803 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0228991377182 0.0443174109184 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.8 13.3589403974 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.41 53.8541721854 82% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.0289183223 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.08 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.498013245 152% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.2008830022 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.