integrated essay -TPO 41
The article mainly states that storing and handling coal ash due to several damages and bad result and he provides 3 reasons to supports hid idea that strict regulations don’t need. On the other hand, in the listening, the professor argues that coal ash should be handled by strict rules and he refutes the author's opinions with bringing some reasons.
Firstly, the reading believes that now that are enough effective regulations related to the environment that power companies represent them. However, the speaker discusses that these regulations are not sufficient and should be built new landfills for depositing coal ash not put them in the old liner, and he provides an example, for prevent environment and don’t let releasing hazardous materials into groundwater and damage in the environment so need some new regulars.
Secondly, the author asserts that storing coal ash maybe produce damages and there are concerns related to recycling coal ash. While, the speaker claims that handling and storing don’t stop recycling coal ash and such as restore mercury metal that handling for a long time and save recycling, so adapting more regulation will need.
Finally, the passage states that new regulars and storing coal ash will enhance cost in power companies. The professor supports that using and applying new regulations will increase extra cost. On the contrary, he believes that power companies always have more customers that for reaching to the clear environment this extra cost can be overlooked.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, look, may, second, secondly, so, while, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 30.3222958057 46% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1301.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 242.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37603305785 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61695555744 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54958677686 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 386.1 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.4982014156 49.2860985944 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.555555556 110.228320801 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8888888889 21.698381199 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0 7.06452816374 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.506335907644 0.272083759551 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.217465486924 0.0996497079465 218% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0746458386146 0.0662205650399 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.311601317418 0.162205337803 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371014104077 0.0443174109184 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.3589403974 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.8541721854 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.2367328918 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.