In this set of materials, both the reading passage and the lecture deal with the pros and cons of the salvage logging, which is the practice of removing dead trees after disasters. Regarding this topic, the lecturer argues that at first glance, salvage logging has several positive influences on the environment, however it is not true. This contradicts the author’s assertion that there are several reasons to prove that salvage logging is advantageous.
First of all, according to the lecture, salvage logging is not helpful to growth of new trees because remained dead trees are able to make suitable conditions to regenerate new trees. This counters the author’s view point that with salvage logging, an area damaged by a devastating fire can play a role in making profitable condition to grow new trees.
Secondly, the lecturer goes on to say that it is unconvincing that salvage logging is profitable because it can remove habitats of insects that can be dangerous to people by providing insect infestation. This is because salvage logging destroy not only harmful insects’ habitats but also habitats of birds or insects, which are necessary to the healthy environment. This challenges the author’s claim that the use salvage logging can be productive to us because it can be remove a suitable habitat of harmful insects.
Lastly, the author assumes that salvage logging should be provide several economic benefits by offering useful wood from dead trees and creating more jobs. However, the lecturer rebuts the author’s assumption by giving several reasons that the economic benefits are not sufficiently large because it would need expensive cost to use and maintain several vehicles that are necessary. Also, the jobs created by salvage logging might increase temporary and are fitted by outsiders who are experts than local residents.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 59, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'provided'?
Suggestion: provided
... assumes that salvage logging should be provide several economic benefits by offering u...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 484, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...e temporary and are fitted by outsiders who are experts than local residents.
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 522, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s who are experts than local residents.
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'lastly', 'regarding', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.268436578171 0.261695866417 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.156342182891 0.158904122519 98% => OK
Adjectives: 0.11209439528 0.0723426182421 155% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0412979351032 0.0435111971325 95% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0176991150442 0.0277247811725 64% => OK
Prepositions: 0.106194690265 0.128828473217 82% => OK
Participles: 0.0383480825959 0.0370669169778 103% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.8134712429 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0324483775811 0.0208969081088 155% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0884955752212 0.128158765124 69% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.023598820059 0.0158828679856 149% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0147492625369 0.0114777025283 129% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1875.0 1645.83664459 114% => OK
No of words: 296.0 271.125827815 109% => OK
Chars per words: 6.33445945946 6.08160592843 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.04852973271 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.432432432432 0.374372842146 116% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.378378378378 0.287516216867 132% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.216216216216 0.187439937562 115% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.121621621622 0.113142543107 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8134712429 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527027027027 0.539623497131 98% => OK
Word variations: 53.3488902004 53.8517498576 99% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0529801325 84% => OK
Sentence length: 26.9090909091 21.7502111507 124% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.9213810353 49.3711431718 59% => OK
Chars per sentence: 170.454545455 132.220823453 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9090909091 21.7502111507 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.909090909091 0.878197800319 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.39072847682 88% => OK
Readability: 64.7469287469 50.5018328374 128% => OK
Elegance: 1.91780821918 1.90840788429 100% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158270566895 0.549887131256 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.178135473728 0.142949733639 125% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0417117914444 0.0787303798458 53% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.681010173689 0.631733273073 108% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0760296376969 0.139662658121 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0925433317652 0.266732575781 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0326317537089 0.103435571967 32% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.328121758239 0.414875509568 79% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0268272616639 0.0530846634433 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115625184854 0.40443939384 29% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.01208903886 0.0528353158467 23% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.26048565121 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 6.0 3.49668874172 172% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.62251655629 138% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 3.1766004415 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 11.0 10.2958057395 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.