Integrated topic tpo
The author of the reading article and the speaker of the lecture both debate on whether the edmontosaur survived the winter by migrating south to more hospitable regions or not. The author states that there are several arguments that support the migration hypothesis and gives three reasons for that. However, the speaker casts doubt each point of the reading by claiming that reading hypothesis is not convincing. The speaker gives three contradicting arguments that suggest edmontosaur did not migrate south to hospitable region to survive in winter.
First of all, the author posits that since there would have been no plants growing during the cold and dark North Slope winter, it appears that edmontosaur must have left for at least part of the year and migrated to more temprarate zones to find food. In contrast, the speaker challenges this point of the reading. The speaker mentions that the weather was warm enough near the cold and dark North Slope during winter. In addition, it was sunshine there that enhances vegetation growth. As a result, edmontosaur can find their food plants easily and survive there.
Next, the author avers that edmontosaur's skeletons have been unearthed from the same site that suggests they lived in herds. In addition, the author explains that moving in herds helps animals coordinate their migration. On the other hand, the speaker refutes this point of the author. The speaker says that it does not mean that edmontosaur migrate in winter because they lived in herds. Besides that, the speaker adds that herds provides protection edmontosaurs from predators. She gives example of rosevlt ak, animal migratory species that they lived in Western United States forests. Therefore, they did not migrate south to hospitable regions in winter.
Finally, the author states that edamontosaurs wre physically capable of migrating long distances. However, the speaker contradicts by stating that juvenile edmontosaurs were not capable physically to move long distances. They were not capable as adult edmontosaurs. This shows that they were not capable to migrate south to hospitable regions to survive winter.
The author of the reading article and the speaker of the lecture both debate on whether the edmontosaur survived the winter by migrating south to more hospitable regions or not. The author states that there are several arguments that support the migration hypothesis and gives three reasons for that. However, the speaker casts doubt each point of the reading by claiming that reading hypothesis is not convincing. The speaker gives three contradicting arguments that suggest edmontosaur did not migrate south to hospitable region to survive in winter.
First of all, the author posits that since there would have been no plants growing during the cold and dark North Slope winter, it appears that edmontosaur must have left for at least part of the year and migrated to more temprarate zones to find food. In contrast, the speaker challenges this point of the reading. The speaker mentions that the weather was warm enough near the cold and dark North Slope during winter. In addition, it was sunshine there that enhances vegetation growth. As a result, edmontosaur can find their food plants easily and survive there.
Next, the author avers that edmontosaur's skeletons have been unearthed from the same site that suggests they lived in herds. In addition, the author explains that moving in herds helps animals coordinate their migration. On the other hand, the speaker refutes this point of the author. The speaker says that it does not mean that edmontosaur migrate in winter because they lived in herds. Besides that, the speaker adds that herds provides protection edmontosaurs from predators. She gives example of rosevlt ak, animal migratory species that they lived in Western United States forests. Therefore, they did not migrate south to hospitable regions in winter.
Finally, the author states that edamontosaurs wre physically capable of migrating long distances. However, the speaker contradicts by stating that juvenile edmontosaurs were not capable physically to move long distances. They were not capable as adult edmontosaurs. This shows that they were not capable to migrate south to hospitable regions to survive winter.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, first, however, so, therefore, at least, in addition, in contrast, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1813.0 1373.03311258 132% => OK
No of words: 341.0 270.72406181 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31671554252 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56532710527 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486803519062 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 539.1 419.366225166 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 14.0 8.23620309051 170% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.7269493706 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.65 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.05 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45 7.06452816374 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.