integrated writing.
Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading passage.
The author states that one fact is certain that we are experiencing a global warming and give three reasons to support that. However, the lecturer casts doubt on each point of the author and states that there is no conclusion to prove that we are experiencing a global warming. The lecturer give three pints to oppose that.
First of all, the author posits that data from sophisticated instruments across the globe indicate a warming trend. In contrast, the lecturer casts doubt on this point by mentioning that thermometers from weather stations on the surface of the Earth are not trustoworthy. These instruments are not well-maintained or monitored or controlled. In addition, a general warming in Usa and Europe did not exist after 1979.
Second, the author avers that unsually high number of icebergs calved from Antarctica in recent years has prompted many to see the reality of global warming. However, the speaker contradicts this point by stating that evidence of an icebergs is flwed. Furthermore, this evidence is failed to mention that a rising tempratures is because of both warming and cooling. The numbers of icebergs are unnatural and related to non-warming. It takes times to study and reaserch for that.
Last, the author states that unbiased organizations such as respected newspapers and international organizations have considered the evidence and accepted as fact the idea that there is a warning trend. In contrast, the speaker challenges this point by saying that these unbiased organizations are not respected carefully. The report by UNEP was publised before it was evaluated. The report is not to inform people but it just to sell papers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 410, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng in Usa and Europe did not exist after 1979. Second, the author avers that uns...
^^
Line 3, column 229, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s this point by stating that evidence of an icebergs is flwed. Furthermore, this ...
^^
Line 3, column 231, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an iceberg' or simply 'icebergs'?
Suggestion: an iceberg; icebergs
...this point by stating that evidence of an icebergs is flwed. Furthermore, this evidence is...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, second, so, well, in addition, in contrast, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1400.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 271.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16605166052 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89926084198 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512915129151 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 432.0 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.22923384 49.2860985944 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9375 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1875 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.080960243166 0.272083759551 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0257085708059 0.0996497079465 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469026624119 0.0662205650399 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0490983436023 0.162205337803 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0191250840669 0.0443174109184 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.