Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading passage. You have 20 minutes to type your response.

Essay topics:

Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading passage. You have 20 minutes to type your response.

The article states that 4 day workweek offers numerous benefits to both business and employees and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that it is true but doesn't have enough profit that convenience us to do it and refutes each of the author's reasons.

First, the article states that 4 day workweek will alleviate some considerable expenses for the average employees. The professor refutes this point by stating that the author only refer to reducing gas amount. The total gas cost in a day that will save is 50-20 dollars that means saving of 50-80 dollars a year. The professor says that it is not enough for deciding to reduce working days.

Second, the reading claims that reducing number of working days will lower the operating cost. However, the professor contends that this has mis guidance. By doing this we reduce the 20% of the business efficiency. Changing working days from 5 to 4 just means to reduce 2 hours a day in 5 days working. The professor states that reducing 20% in business is not justified.

Third, the author avers that 4 day workweek will improve the ability of employees to spend time with their families. The professor oppose this by stating that it is not significantly true. He says, if they have little children, they should take care of them all the day and just one day out of work doesnt enough. Other wise if their kids are old enough to go to school, so the kids spend half of the day in school.

Votes
Average: 0.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 187, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... professor explains that it is true but doesnt have enough profit that convenience us ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 315, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...t means saving of 50-80 dollars a year. The professor says that it is not enough fo...
^^^
Line 7, column 132, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'opposes'.
Suggestion: opposes
...time with their families. The professor oppose this by stating that it is not signific...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 300, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ll the day and just one day out of work doesnt enough. Other wise if their kids are ol...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, third, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1214.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 259.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68725868726 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41104775251 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521235521236 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 351.9 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.9917935767 49.2860985944 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.9333333333 110.228320801 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2666666667 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 7.06452816374 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0556136890237 0.272083759551 20% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0212220916268 0.0996497079465 21% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0249385326104 0.0662205650399 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0368456173688 0.162205337803 23% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00157039012694 0.0443174109184 4% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.3589403974 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 53.8541721854 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 12.2367328918 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.