Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Students are a crucial part of our society. The personality of children form from when they go to school where teach them how to live better. Some people believe that teacher should force their students that they do projects alone, while others hold the opposite view. In my opinion, students should work on their projects alone for two noticeable reasons.
The main reason is that in group assignment students can share their information together and do their projects quickly. Every individual in group has different thought about subjects. When they do their projects with each other, each of them can recommend different way to solve their task quickly. For example, when I, who was very shy, was in high school, my biology teacher gave right to students to do their projects whether alone or in groups. Some of the students selected group projects, while I preferred did my projects lonely. The teacher gave two weeks in order to complete our assignments. I allocated all my daily time for my task. However, I could not do it in time in spite of significant effort. Unfortunately, I fail to prepare my projects and could not pass my course, whereas those who did their task in groups got higher score. This experience taught me that doing projects in groups have positive role in grade.
The another reason that collaborating projects in class increase social skill of students. Some pupils are shy and try to avoid other people. The best place for changing their personality is class where students can do their task collaboratively. Therefore, teachers should push their students to do their projects in group so as to rise their sociability. For instance, when I who was very shy in elementary school, all the time was lonely and did not have any friends. My parents was anxious about my personality and suggested my teacher to help me communicate with other students. He decided to give students joint task in order to influence on personality of pupils. At first, I could not do my task very well while, as over time, I learnt how to communicate with my group because I had to share my knowledge and spoke loudly. As you can see, doing projects in groups really change the personality of students significantly.
In conclusion, the students learn much more effectively when they do their projects together instead of alone. Not only does it cause they to do their task quickly, but also it increases their social skill positively. All teachers should assign projects to their students if they want to help their pupils.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 451, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...ir projects whether alone or in groups. Some of the students selected group projects, while...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 325, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... students to do their projects in group so as to rise their sociability. For instance, w...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, really, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 64.0 43.0788530466 149% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2114.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 431.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90487238979 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64922325169 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477958236659 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 633.6 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.4396634998 48.9658058833 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.3076923077 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5769230769 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.80769230769 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238677664722 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0820859524502 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.069566486825 0.0737576698707 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187064016177 0.150856017488 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375996805218 0.0645574589148 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.07 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.