Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Being well-informed in today's progressive world has a crucial role in awaring people. Several events happen in daily life that by knowing them people could increase their knowledge and make better decision. Some people believe that getting information from various news resources make them well-informed, whereas some others hold an opposite attitude toward this idea. In my view, people could increase their information by attending more news resources for two noticeable reasons.
The main reason is that by using different data resource you gain international knowledge and don't restrict your information to your own society. According to high speed of international growth in each aspect of militry, education, population and technology, every day, we confront large amount of information which is covered by several means. Being aware of diverse resource gives people a good knowledge and perspective of our current position in the world. For example, I always tend to follow English news like BBC in addition to our own country news. Also, I didn't confine my information only to television news and utilize both newspapers and internet websites. Therefore, I obtain a vast knowledge about policy, culture, and religion of not only my own country, but also other countries. I could share huge amount of information which gain from diverse resource with my coulligs and people known me as a well-informed person. If I had not attended to different data resource, I wouldn't aware of different information.
Second, as there is exaggeration in news resources, you get reliable data by attending various resources. Nowadays, there are great number of sources to announce the news which competing to attract more people and increase their advocates by revealing false news. So, people have to check many information resource to attain trustable data which improve their knowledge. For instance, statistics demonstrated direct relationship between indevidiual's information and number of sources they attend. Researchers investigated two groups of people, one who follow different news resources and other group concentrate on ristricted resource, to determine the level of information. Results showed that people who get their data from limited sources didn't have high level of knowledge due to some means like websites, local newspapers and so on overstate in some cases, however, first group who expand their data could get right information and increase information level by analyzing several news resources. As you can see, reviewing diverse data base get people good and reliable level of information.
In conclusion, being in contact with large number of news sources create better situation to become well-informed. Not only do people gain international knowledge, but they also gain reliable data. I think people should pay more attention to various news bases to contious themselves.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 95, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ce you gain international knowledge and dont restrict your information to your own s...
^^^^
Line 5, column 566, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...dition to our own country news. Also, I didnt confine my information only to televisi...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 987, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
... attended to different data resource, I wouldnt aware of different information. Se...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 290, Rule ID: MANY_FEW_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Use 'much' or 'little' with uncountable nouns.
Suggestion: much; little
...ng false news. So, people have to check many information resource to attain trustabl...
^^^^
Line 9, column 290, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun information seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much information', 'a good deal of information'.
Suggestion: much information; a good deal of information
...ng false news. So, people have to check many information resource to attain trustable data which...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 743, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...who get their data from limited sources didnt have high level of knowledge due to som...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, well, whereas, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in my view, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2463.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 447.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51006711409 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59808378696 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91226709647 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519015659955 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 765.0 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0641093999 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.954545455 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3181818182 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.18181818182 5.45110844103 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233509744805 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0729825905321 0.076458572812 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530186112329 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14533680523 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0264416321958 0.0645574589148 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 10.9000537634 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.