Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In today's progressive and sophisticated world where we live, no one can turn a blind eye to the significant effects of various new sources on people's lives. In this regard, some are inclined toward the opinion that obtaining information from various news resources have numerous advantages. On the other extreme of the rope, others think that it is a waste of time to check different news sources. Although both sides take their own positions, personally speaking, I firmly believe that the first group carries more weight. In the following paragraphs, I will cogently explain my reasons to justify my viewpoints.
As the first and paramount reason, since news sources broadcast paradoxical information, not only should not people trust them, but they also should consider other resources to gain reliable news effectively. In other words, nowadays, various news sources declare news and explain happens all across the world according to their benefits; consequently, they may exaggerate or distort information or occurrence and announce them conspicuously to persuade their followers and audiences. Take my own experience as a compelling example. Last year, I read hot news about a very famous soccer player, who plays in our city’s team, and I ignore it immediately because I knew him very well and I guessed this news is more likely to be wrong. After that, I decided to search for this hot news on the Internet. Finally, I found out that was a fake advertisement about a product, which had been made by the commercial channel of the club. In fact, that channel had been attracting numerous fans and gaining a lot of profit by broadcasting that fake news about a popular athlete. Therefore, the more news resources people read and follow, the more accurate and up-to-date information they can obtain properly.
The second reason coming to my mind to substantiate my viewpoint is that some news channels do not broadcast events elaborately; thus, searching for perfect news and follow them via different sources can develop people's information and expand their horizons remarkably. For instance, a research conducted by some professors in a university shows that trying to make a lot of profit through various advertisements and commercial news, several new established channels start broadcasting hot news about different events to attract various followers, but they do not dedicate enough time to interpret and discuss them perfectly with minor details. In this line of thought, if individuals read these non-elaborated and segment news, they will not well-informed about events. Hence, being exposed to different news sources such as websites and newspapers can help people to get informed about complete and expeditious news all around the world.
In conclusion, not only do not news resources broadcast events accurately, but they also do not assign enough time to analyze and broadcast them in detail. Therefore, people should follow other sources to obtain complete and reliable news significantly.
- If people want to contribute to society, which of the following is the best way?1. Riding a bicycle or walking on foot2. Recycling the waste3. Buy local organic food 88
- fire 66
- Do you agree or disagree: It is impossible to always be completely honest with your friends? 83
- Some people think the media including newspapers, televisions,radio, and internet sourcesare less concerned with the accuracy of the news. some people think the information from the media are becoming incorrect . Do you agree with this opinion or 73
- How do movies and television influence people s behavior 37
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, hence, if, may, second, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, i guess, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 13.8261648746 174% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2540.0 1977.66487455 128% => OK
No of words: 480.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29166666667 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68069463864 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91377758698 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53125 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 772.2 618.680645161 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.623496457 48.9658058833 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.684210526 100.406767564 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2631578947 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.52631578947 5.45110844103 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176291310224 0.236089414692 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0585376890345 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.037341029066 0.0737576698707 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118387597385 0.150856017488 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346707710668 0.0645574589148 54% => OK
automated_readability_index: 16.1 11.7677419355 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 86.8835125448 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.