fire
The article states that three kinds of damage caused by the let it burn policy was emphasized by critics of the policy and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that this policy is not a destructive but also it is a creative method and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading states that Yellowstone fire caused damage to the trees and vegetation. The professor refutes this point. He states that this fire can create the new opportunity for small plants to grow. Furthermore, some plants need high temperature to grow and this fire is a good factor for them.
Second, the article claims that the park wildlife was affected and animals were seen fleeing the fire. However, the professor says that not only the animal population will decrease, but also their population will increase and new plants after fire create new habitants and new animals such as rabbit can live there and new food chain will create there.
Third, the reading avers that the fires compromised the value of the park as a tourist attraction and it has a negative consequences for the local economy. The lecture opposes this point by saying that this fire will not happen every year. That pervious forest fire happened in the unusual combination of factors such as low rainfall. Also, lecture says that after that fire tourist came back to that park next year.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 121, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'consequence'?
Suggestion: consequence
...ourist attraction and it has a negative consequences for the local economy. The lecture oppo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, third, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 30.3222958057 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1148.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 235.0 270.72406181 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88510638298 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37342309042 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523404255319 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 352.8 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0525813593 49.2860985944 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6666666667 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5833333333 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 7.06452816374 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342282617414 0.272083759551 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15043660302 0.0996497079465 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.093512558814 0.0662205650399 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203706215875 0.162205337803 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135616130715 0.0443174109184 306% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.