Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
There are two opposite poles about a well-informed person is the one who looks through different resources of news or chooses to be loyal at only one resource. I agree with the first definition of this person. Two following reasons are elaborated in this essay.
Firstly, most of the resources are full of impeccable data. Actually, some of them may contain inaccurate information or delusive allegations about a particular topic. Another point that should be discussed is that they can also lack clarity and understandable context while interpreting the news to publicity. If people decide to scan off other various resources, they can test the accuracy of content by comparison and find a platform using better interpretation. For example, Maya civilization’s prediction about the end of the world went viral on all digital platforms in 2012. On account of this fake information, a considerable amount of people sold their possessions. In addition to this, the economy of some countries was damaged tremendously.
Secondly, searching up new resources allow us to gather diverse information and enrich our statements. It plays an essential role in us to develop broad perspectives, detect our blind spots and look closer to different opinions. As a result of this, we can build an open-minded mindset with much better comprehensive skills with the help of authentic resources. For example, most of the students collect information about their school projects from different resources some of which are internet, book, and encyclopedia. Their professors extremely care that they emphasize citations and references on their works. Thus, they can be able to acquire adequate knowledge and make their incapacity disappear away. Consequently, it is undeniable that students would not be able to present their assignments excessively by depending on a single resource.
To sum up, a well-informed person should rely on many trustworthy resources and have a rich sense of perspective.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, consequently, first, firstly, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1688.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 311.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42765273312 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21395464357 2.67179642975 120% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.636655948553 0.524837075471 121% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.3081982788 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.7777777778 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2777777778 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 5.45110844103 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171032560097 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0481702370533 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046027970918 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114715031222 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551644444645 0.0645574589148 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.