Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Children’s education is one of the most important pillar of success in their lives. Kids are in the age in which they require to have role-models and utilize their advice to be more prosperous in their education. Some people believe that in today's progressive world parents have a crucial role in children’s education rather than the past, whereas some others hold an opposite attitude. In my view, nowadays parents spend much time on dealing with their kids’ education for two remarkable reasons.
The main reason is that in today's life parents have more free time to allocate to their children’s education. In the past, generally, parents had several kids whose upbringing took them a lot of time and working hard to support their expenses. Also, life was really hard and people confronted the lack of necessary needs, so parents had to spend more time on purchasing, cooking, and working far from home on farm lands. For example, when I was a kid, I had a crowded family with several siblings. As I remember, my father had to work hard even at weekends to make a living and my mother always was busy in house works and taking care of my younger siblings. Therefore, none of them had time to help me in my school assignments. However, now, since through my experience I learn that having less kids is better, I have only one child, not only I could spend all of my time with her, but I could involve in her education more than my parents which brings her more success in future. Today's life provides parent's with more chance to involve in their kids’ education.
Second, nowadays parents' level of education increases which enhances their involvement in their children’s education. In majority of past societies, since science didn’t grow enough to alert people from its advantages, education didn't have its own value that have today leading to training a low educated future parents. As time goes, the significance of education in having convenience life is more clarified; as a result, todays parents both have high level of education and spend time on improving their kids’ education. For instance, statistics demonstrate direct relation between parent's level of education and the time they share with their children to help them in courses. Researchers' investigation shows that since in today's life technology is improved, adults are more inclined to continue academic education that prepare more informed parents who pay more attention to their kids’ education. If people in past had conceived the value of education, they would have bold role in their children's education.
In conclusion, I do believe that today, parents allocate more time on their kid's education. Not only do they have more free time, but they also have high level of education to understand the importance of education. I think children educational success is related to amount of time their parents spend to help them in their courses.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 797, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun kids is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...rough my experience I learn that having less kids is better, I have only one child, ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 977, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...y parents which brings her more success in future. Todays life provides parents with more...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 240, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...t people from its advantages, education didnt have its own value that have today lead...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, really, second, so, therefore, whereas, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, as a result, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 80.0 52.1666666667 153% => OK
Nominalization: 28.0 8.0752688172 347% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2488.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 489.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08793456033 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70248278971 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79241238398 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.449897750511 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 790.2 618.680645161 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1843314211 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.476190476 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2857142857 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319499572568 0.236089414692 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134152032875 0.076458572812 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079360098225 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24026215292 0.150856017488 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028016833434 0.0645574589148 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.