Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize.

The ability to plan is one of the important pillar of success in each society. By having specific plan people able to manage their works better which leads to their prosperity. Some people believe that in today's complicated world it is vital to young people to have the ability to manage, whereas some others hold an opposite attitude. In my view, in today's competitive life it is essential for youngsters to have organization ability for two remarkable reasons.

The main reason is that in today's complicated life people could make better decisions by having the planning ability. Modern life comprise of several dilemmas people could calm their mind down by managing their works and problems. By this mean, people would be able to concentrate on their works better and make logical decisions. For example, when I began my work in apple company, I interfered with large amount of problems which was required me to make several decisions that could determine my future in the job. At first, always I couldn't put my works in order and not only they took me a lot of time, but I also made wrong decisions and ruined the projects. As time went, I learned to plan my tasks which provided me with more relief and able me to pay more attention on each of them which led me to success in both making better decision and gaining better results. If I had not organized my works, I would not make sound decisions.

Second, by planning one's tasks in today's life, people could increase their efficiency. When people manage their works, they could prevent from overwhelming in large amount of works. Therefore, they could save significant amount of time and use this time to do extra works. For instance, statistics demonstrate that there is a direct relation between ability to plan and the efficiency that one's has. Researchers' investigation among two groups reveals that people who are able to organize their tasks could do large amount of work in specific amount of time due to their ability to plan help them to complete a work in little time. On the other hand, people who not able to manage their tasks not only decrease their efficiency, but they also put themselves in a severe pressure to do well. As you can see, people could benefit a lot by planning.

In conclusion, I do believe that people could gain a lot of advantages by organizing their work in today's progressive world. Not only could they make better decisions, but they also increase their efficiency. I think that people should pay more attention to improve the ability to plan in themselves.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 131, Rule ID: COMPRISE_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprise' or 'consist of'?
Suggestion: comprise; consist of
...aving the planning ability. Modern life comprise of several dilemmas people could calm thei...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 537, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...y future in the job. At first, always I couldnt put my works in order and not only they...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 21, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...und decisions. Second, by planning ones tasks in todays life, people could incr...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, therefore, well, whereas, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in my view, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2128.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 443.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80361173815 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53893848746 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.446952595937 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 669.6 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0434408613 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.333333333 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0952380952 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195776525401 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0739655746792 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515005283273 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143766338963 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0646251383896 0.0645574589148 100% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.