Should governments spend more money on improving roads and highways, or should governments spend more money on improving public transportation (buses, trains, subways)? Why? Use specific reasons and details to develop your essay.

Essay topics:

Should governments spend more money on improving roads and highways, or should governments spend more money on improving public transportation (buses, trains, subways)? Why? Use specific reasons and details to develop your essay.

Roads are important part of transportation system. They are what connect different places to each other and make it easy to travel. Some people believe that government should spend more money on improving roads and highways than public transportation. Others hold the opposite opinion. In my view, the roads should be improven for two remarkable reasons.

First, better roads absorb more travelers that means more money for city. When government increase the quality of roads, convenience of people in traval grow signaficantly. Therefore, people prefer to travel to our city and more tourism provide more money for government. For example, I live in urmia, where government pay more attention to highten the quality of citizens' life. Each year government spend noticeable amount of money on improving the cities’ roads and highways, which grow the convenience of citizens in urban traveling, furthermore, cause ease comunication with other cities that attract more travelers. These tourists spend a lot of money in various ways like resturants, renting room, and creates more jobs for cities citizens. This money returns to government in different methods that can use it for other parts such as improving public transportation. As you can clearly see, it is better to spend money on improving roads, because it returns back more money.

Second, it can increase life of viechals. If a road has low quality which means a lot of bumps and puddels, it can damage your veichal and decrease its life. For instance, I studied mechanical engineering, one of my project was about determining factors that increase the life of vehicles. The first thing that I learned was that times of repair has a direct relationship with the length of a viechal life's. Two roads were simulated, one with high quality other with low. It demonstrated that low quality roads cause more fraction on the tire of viechal and increase fuel usage, moreover, each time you drive on a puddle in the road you hurt your cars springs. Therefore, a low quality road leads you to repair your car more often and more repair decreasing vehicles life. It is obvious if government improve road quality, our viechals life increase and we can save a lot of money by not repairing them.

In conclusion, spending money on improving roads is better than improving public transportation. Not only does it provide more money for government by absorbing travelers, but also it can increase life of viechals. I think government in each city should pay more attention to quality of roads.

Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:


Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 964, Rule ID: RETURN_BACK[1]
Message: Use simply 'returns'.
Suggestion: returns
...nd money on improving roads, because it returns back more money. Second, it can increase l...

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, in my view

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2133.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 419.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09069212411 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78093862816 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479713603819 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 655.2 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.5024968089 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.875 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4583333333 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389630547699 0.236089414692 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124585823222 0.076458572812 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108455389008 0.0737576698707 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2895928488 0.150856017488 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0999595225182 0.0645574589148 155% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.