Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

The money which government allocates to different part of the society has a vital role in progressing the community. Government is president of people who should leads the citizen’s effort and taxes in a proper way. Some people believe that government should invest on improving internet access rather than enhancing public transportation, whereas some others hold an opposite attitude. In my view, governments should pay more attention on people access on internet for two remarkable reasons.

The main reason is that by investing on improving internet access government could guarantee the future success of their citizens. If people have easy access on internet, they can expand their knowledge by reading various data source. Therefore, they are provided with more experience through all over the world which help them to make rational decision that lead them to prospers. For example, I live in a country where all kind of internet information are available easily. I could get familiar with various perspectives by knowing diverse culture. Not only do I save a lot of time in doing my works by internet, but I also could gain vast information which takes me much time and energy to gather without internet. As a result, I turn to a well-rounded person who is able to advise valuable content to friends and flourish in my own life because of sound decisions I make. If my country had not enhanced the access to internet, I would not lead to success.

Second, today it is important for societies to keep their pace with the high rate of technology growth which requires government to spend more money on internet access. In today's progressive world, without doubt internet is one of the crucial pillar to able societies to compete with others in technology growth. Nowadays, people are dependent on internet for doing their several tasks. Therefore, good access to internet make their life much easier and enjoyable. People with good spirit have more motivation to help the society to progress. For instance, statistics demonstrate that there is a direct relation between people quality of access to internet and community progress. Researchers' investigation among to society reveals that society in which citizens are please from internet availability try harder to help the community growth due to they think that they should return the government with more profit to enable it to provided more welfare to people. As you can see, improving internet access have a lot of benefits for both people and governments.

In conclusion, I do believe that the advantages of investing money on internet access overweight the benefits of improving public transportation. Not only does government guarantee its citizens success, but it also could compete better with other countries and increase its progress rate. I think that each government should pay more attention to enhance the people access to internet.

Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories


Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 205, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper way" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily". the citizen's effort and taxes in a proper way. Some people believe that government sh...

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so, therefore, well, whereas, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, in my view

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 52.1666666667 142% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2457.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 471.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21656050955 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65859790218 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8062222582 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488322717622 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 765.9 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9600385311 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.826086957 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4782608696 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.91304347826 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299148444381 0.236089414692 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0975648215813 0.076458572812 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0685566411543 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205886779014 0.150856017488 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324134614586 0.0645574589148 50% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.