Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily. Use specific reasons and

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

The ability to find friend is one of the important pillar in become prospers in social relationship. by finding friends people can share their feelings with someone else and learn to have better interaction in society. Some people believe that it is more important to have ability to maintain few friends for long time than the ability to seek for new friends easily, where as some others hold an opposite attitude. In my view, it is much better to be able save friendship with few people than trying to find new friends all the time for two remarkable reasons.

The main reason is that by preserving an old friend people have someone to get better advice to them in problem. When people change their friends, they don't have much time to know a lot about each other. In contrast, by having few friends who are familiar with your feelings for a long time, you can solve your problems by getting logical help with them as they are familiar with your personality. For example, I have two loyal friends from my childhood. We spend most of our times with each other and have vast information about each of us feelings. When I wanted to get married, I had hard time in choosing between several boys. Since my friends knew me well, they provided me with various aspects of my problem that I didn't consider. By consulting them, I could make sound decision which led to my success marriage. If I had not had the ability to save my old friends, I would not solve my problem logically.

Second, the capability to maintain few friends for long time decrease the stress level in humans. Although it is good to have ability to alter one's friends frequently, it provides a more stressful condition for people as they don't know new people well and should be conservative and behave in an inconvenience manner. For instance, statistics demonstrate that there is direct relation between the amount of stress in person's body and facing to new friends. Researchers' investigation among two groups reveals that people who don't have stable friends for long time have more level of anxiety due to they couldn't predict the personality of new friends. By having old friends, people feel more relief to share their ideas with them which make them feel comfortable. As you can see, people can benefit a lot by using the ability to preserve old friends.

In conclusion, I do believe that the advantages of having few friends for long time over weight the benefits of changing friends regularly. Not only can people get better advice from old friends, but they also have less anxiety. I think people should pay more attention to improve the ability to save their friends in themselves.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: By
...become prospers in social relationship. by finding friends people can share their ...
^^
Line 1, column 369, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...ability to seek for new friends easily, where as some others hold an opposite attitude. ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 153, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... When people change their friends, they dont have much time to know a lot about each...
^^^^
Line 5, column 722, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...th various aspects of my problem that I didnt consider. By consulting them, I could m...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 144, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ugh it is good to have ability to alter ones friends frequently, it provides a more ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 227, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... stressful condition for people as they dont know new people well and should be cons...
^^^^
Line 9, column 525, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...mong two groups reveals that people who dont have stable friends for long time have ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 603, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
... have more level of anxiety due to they couldnt predict the personality of new friends....
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so, well, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in contrast, in my view

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2210.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 464.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76293103448 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64119157421 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4922358255 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.459051724138 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 667.8 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1126000259 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.454545455 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0909090909 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.86363636364 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328659278754 0.236089414692 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105739547896 0.076458572812 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693538153945 0.0737576698707 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233497393044 0.150856017488 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0676240316551 0.0645574589148 105% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.