Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In today's progressive world it is undoubtedly crucial to increase your efficiency. World are going to forward in each aspects of science, economy, technology, and so on with the highest speed ever, so to be related to this rate of progress people have to take more challenges and deal with difficulties. Some people believe that today's world require people who do works quickly and accept its risk rather than conservative ones, whereas, some others hold an opposite attitude. In my view, people need to be riskier and complete work as soon as possible to be more successful nowadays for two remarkable reasons.
The main reason is that working with high speed increase the persons' experience in their fields. By doing tasks quickly people have chance to include with the variety of issues, while increase the rate of errors. However, accepting the risk of working with high speed confront people with plenty of mistakes which enhance their knowledge and experience. For example, when I initiated my work in Apple company, all the time, I tried to spend a lot of time on each of my projects and making sure that I fulfil it perfectly. Although my slow speed in working, my rate of progress was significantly low. After consulting with my boss, he advised me to do my projects fast and allowing myself to make mistakes which I could learn from them a lot. By increasing my speed in doing job, I gain large amount of valuable information which leads to my success in my job. As you see, working quickly provided noticeable benefits.
Second, people, who act quickly in their jobs, could make better decisions. In today's world, there is intensive competition in grasping prosperity. Therefore, individuals who are courage enough to take risks and bear difficulties have more opportunity to get familiar with more perspectives. Knowing different aspects leads to making high quality decisions. For instance, statistics show the direct relationship between velocity of doing works and making effective decisions. Researchers demonstrated that people who have the high rate in work could learn a lot from their failure which enlight the various part of their field to them. As a result, people have sufficient knowledge in dealing better with dilemmas and make more efficient decisions for their future. This investigation taught me that working fast has great number of advantages.
In conclusion, decreasing the time of completing a task is better than spent much time on it and deprive yourself from a lot of benefits. Not only it provided individuals with more valuable experiences, but it also helps in improve the quality of their decisions. I think people should pay more attention in increasing their speed of applying works.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 172, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...ping prosperity. Therefore, individuals who are courage enough to take risks and bear d...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, so, therefore, whereas, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, as a result, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2296.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 450.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10222222222 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76389865995 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517777777778 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 696.6 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8746618524 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8260869565 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5652173913 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95652173913 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249035718353 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783217048771 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411240162138 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147462729193 0.150856017488 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546041356841 0.0645574589148 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.