In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.
According to the drastic growth of population and consequently rapid increase in the demands of people in a society, producer and manager tend to produce their production more and more faster in high quantities. Therefore, some people hold this idea that accelerate in the production is the best way to acquire more benefits. However, some people prefer to do their work correctly, even in much more time. When it comes to me, certainly, I would follow those value to the accuracy of a project due to the several reasons, which some of the most outstanding of them are elaborated in detail in the following:
Fisrt of all, lack of enough accuracy in some project and some jobs would be caused to a serious disaster such as death of a lot of people. As an obvious example, if an airplane engineer does his work incorrectly due to the using less time and likely airplane falls, a lot of people would be killed because of this lack of enough accuracy. So, in some work which health of people may be exposed in the damages, worker are perciesly responsible to do their works completely faultless.
Second, another reason that I hold this view that people should do their works with maximum accuracy is that this way is potential to reduce costs. For example, consider two house ,with same primary investment ,which one of them is constructed in at least time and consequently at least accuracy, while another one is built by a profficional team with best design and based on highly precise in the construction. After a while, obviously, the former would be deteriorating, wherease, the latter would not has even a difference with it at the firs. Thus, the house which is built in less time would need to the repairment and subsequently expenses.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 181, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'faster' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: faster
...nd to produce their production more and more faster in high quantities. Therefore, some peo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...laborated in detail in the following: Fisrt of all, lack of enough accuracy in...
^^
Line 5, column 176, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'house' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'houses'.
Suggestion: houses
...reduce costs. For example, consider two house ,with same primary investment ,which on...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 181, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e costs. For example, consider two house ,with same primary investment ,which one ...
^^
Line 5, column 211, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... two house ,with same primary investment ,which one of them is constructed in at l...
^^
Line 5, column 349, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the best'.
Suggestion: with the best
...her one is built by a profficional team with best design and based on highly precise in t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 507, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...orating, wherease, the latter would not has even a difference with it at the firs. ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, thus, whereas, while, at least, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 1977.66487455 73% => OK
No of words: 302.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79139072848 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70689237835 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 212.727598566 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53642384106 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 618.680645161 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.6003584229 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.1344086022 149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.0976312061 48.9658058833 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.7 100.406767564 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.2 20.6045352989 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7 5.45110844103 196% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0776331861658 0.236089414692 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0387159582959 0.076458572812 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397934469261 0.0737576698707 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0564577367317 0.150856017488 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.024917517751 0.0645574589148 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 11.7677419355 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.0537634409 139% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.