teachers should not make their political and social point of views known to students
Although policy and society play a major role in the people life as well as students, especially in their decisions in their lives, it is an interesting question whether is necessary that teachers talk about their personal views of society or policy for students or not. Some people pretend that their children know about these subjects in the school but some others disagree with it. When it comes to me, certainly, I will follow those disagree with this issue due to the several reason, some of the most outstanding of which are elaborated in detail in the following:
First and foremost, there are probably students who are not interested about society and policy. So, when a teacher talks about his or her social and political views in the classroom, students who are not interested in these subjects obviously will be tired. In addition, theses student will lose their time due to this fact that their teacher allocated a lot of time for this reason instead of scientific subjects. As an example, if a student tends to the focus on art, social and political conversations in his or her class might be as a distractive issue.
Secondly, conversations about policy and society are typically such controversial that they are potential to be cause of conflicts between students. Thus, students might will miss not only their friendly relationships but also their cooperation in their team works, and eventually they can’t work with each other as a colleague same the their past. As a result, political and conversations in a classroom is able to destroy relationships between students.
Another reason, although teachers are very logical and respectable persons in the society, political and social attitudes of a teacher may be incorrect and biased. Therefore, students likely will follow a biased view which their teacher teaches to them. In this reason, it is much better that teachers be bound of talking about their social and political views for students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 474, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun reason seems to be countable; consider using: 'several reasons'.
Suggestion: several reasons
...ose disagree with this issue due to the several reason, some of the most outstanding of which ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...laborated in detail in the following: First and foremost, there are probably s...
^^
Line 5, column 111, Rule ID: BE_CAUSE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'because'?
Suggestion: because
...ontroversial that they are potential to be cause of conflicts between students. Thus, st...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 340, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'their'?
Suggestion: the; their
...ork with each other as a colleague same the their past. As a result, political and conver...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, in addition, talking about, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1655.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 325.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09230769231 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7525136441 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501538461538 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.0246535121 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.916666667 100.406767564 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0833333333 20.6045352989 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 5.45110844103 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318400817076 0.236089414692 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134859904044 0.076458572812 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0814198064914 0.0737576698707 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217636728735 0.150856017488 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.090725772875 0.0645574589148 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 11.7677419355 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.1575268817 124% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.