Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site.
Nowadays, rapidly development of technology in most of the aspects of people life make it easier for those who utilize of it to achieve their certain goals in their life. Although, some people think that this technology probably would cause to problems in education routes, I definitely disagree with this idea. I have several reasons for my view, some of most persuasive of which are elaborated in detail in the following:
First and foremost, one of the outstanding my reason to have this notion that technology does not hard education of children is that technology can be used positively through educating. In this way, not only is not education a disruption for children but also could be a facility. As an example, writing, copying, erasing, or taking a note with the help of technology would be far more convenient. So, if the technology be used as a facility in the education, it is able to even make education so much easier that it in the past.
Secondly, technology provide easily a wide spectrum of science for children, resulting in simply availability to a large number of scientific subjects. Hence, students have this opportunity to access to every topic of science, so that can follow to the scientific topic at ease. Nevertheless, as a can imagine, in the past accessibility to the scientific sources was much more that today. Therefore, technology provide this chance for students to receive their needed knowledge easily. For example, students in the past for some of their research must asked it of a lot of people, and maybe they were not enough informative, but now every student can search in the internet and find a lot of papers, books, and such things related to their research project.
As the last reason, searching in the internet and use of technology in order to objects which are related to the education short the needed time for such objects. It is so obvious that searching in internet is far more time-effective than founding a certain subject in various books. So, the technology is potential to reduction in the time, which is required to gain information about a given idea. Eventually, that saved time, would be exerted to more researching and learning, that this possibility without the technology was unlike in the previous.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on so much easier that it in the past. Secondly, technology provide easily a wi...
^^
Line 4, column 116, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...en, resulting in simply availability to a large number of scientific subjects. Hence, students ha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ngs related to their research project. As the last reason, searching in the int...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1894.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 383.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94516971279 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84231208884 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496083550914 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 612.9 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.4118067609 48.9658058833 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.266666667 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5333333333 20.6045352989 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13333333333 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146274052745 0.236089414692 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0613316841522 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546922978809 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0913367065138 0.150856017488 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495133714651 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 10.002688172 205% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.