Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school.
Todays, successful relationships with other people in the society plays a major role in the personal success in peoples’ lives. Some people think that being hard-working is an adequate feature to attain their goals either in personal life, or in social life. Nevertheless, others work on their skill to having successful relations as the most important feature to being success. When it comes to me, certainly, I would follow those that have given value to the ability of relate to people well instead of studying intensively in school. I have several reasons for my statement, which some of the most outstanding of them are described in the detail in the following:
The first and foremost reason, the lack of strong relationships with other colleague causes to fail in carry of our implication to them. If someone be unable to explain his or her ideas to the others, she or he would not be able to be in a team which all of the members should cooperate with each other, even if he or she be a skilled expert in his or her job. For example, I have an elite friend in my high school career who could surprisingly solves complex mathematics problems, but we always failed in our teamwork in our class if she was in our team because she could not relate well with us.
Secondly, skill of contact well with others led to the learn a lot of things among relationships, even that information which someone could not learn in school. As an example, I was in very hard situation in a period of my life when I was a high school student as much as I was not able to study steadily in order to my exam. I, however, have taken high score in this exam because I had glowing relationships with my classmates, so they helped me in the learning of my courses, and they taught those lessons to me.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'failing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: failing
...lationships with other colleague causes to fail in carry of our implication to them. If...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 150, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
... of our implication to them. If someone be unable to explain his or her ideas to t...
^^
Line 3, column 253, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...would not be able to be in a team which all of the members should cooperate with each othe...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 324, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...rate with each other, even if he or she be a skilled expert in his or her job. For...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... she could not relate well with us. Secondly, skill of contact well with oth...
^^
Line 5, column 54, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...kill of contact well with others led to the learn a lot of things among relationships, ev...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1977.66487455 74% => OK
No of words: 324.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.54012345679 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66954255932 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54012345679 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 618.680645161 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.94265232975 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.6003584229 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.1344086022 159% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.7649453051 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.1 100.406767564 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.4 20.6045352989 157% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.45110844103 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213864856996 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0902632093866 0.076458572812 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583669336211 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142090395275 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0831228718984 0.0645574589148 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 11.7677419355 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.0537634409 147% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.