As humans are born, they could do nothing by individuals. They start crying when they want food. They would be trained by their family how to walk, speak, run, etc. All the babies are influenced by their environment, for example, they will start walking even they are very tiny, so even after failure, they try again. If the children do not accept the risk of fallen down, he could not escalate his body and walk as soon. Many people adhere to work slowly but accurately, while others believe to accept the risks and work quickly to get more benefits. Ego, when I come to my stance, by weighing the pros and cons, I firmly hold that working quickly and accept the risk could lead us to make a brilliant future. In what follows, I will cogently pinpoint my most conspicuous reasons to justify my point of view.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that if we do not make a decision quickly, many chances would be evolved. Some golden scenario would occur once and by losing the time for making a right resolution lead us to a dire consequence.For example, imagine a company which has two viable options to tackle a problem within six months. If the leader waits until the last days, spending a substantial amount of time on recognizing the best solution, they lose the chance to try other solutions when the first one fails because of some internal or external problems. On the other hand, when the leader is fast, the company is less likely not to solve the problem
Another equally significant to be mentioned is that even we make a mistake in this way, these mistakes make us valuable experiences, which make us stronger. For instance; when I started my own business, the ministry of agriculture of Herat province announced a project, even this project was not my major I risked to gain that. Unfortunately, I field because I have no experience of doing such a project, but it taught me a very important lessons. Now I easily could lead those kinds of projects for minor time.
In brief, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons, to be a successful person in our life, we should accept the risks and do it quickly. Thus we could afford more money in less time. otherwise, problems and mistakes would be the best teacher for us.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 240, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...esolution lead us to a dire consequence.For example, imagine a company which has tw...
^^^
Line 3, column 440, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'lesson'?
Suggestion: lesson
...ject, but it taught me a very important lessons. Now I easily could lead those kinds of...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 141, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...uld accept the risks and do it quickly. Thus we could afford more money in less time...
^^^^
Line 4, column 187, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Otherwise
...e could afford more money in less time. otherwise, problems and mistakes would be the bes...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in brief, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1848.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 398.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6432160804 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58180959099 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56783919598 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.5621912802 48.9658058833 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.666666667 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166491298171 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0495010926701 0.076458572812 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719610447789 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0931600446277 0.150856017488 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424453079352 0.0645574589148 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.