: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading passage. You have 20 minutes to type your response.
The article states that the current variety of organisms that exist on earth must be preserved but this safeguarding of endangered species is unnatural and provids three reasons for support. However, the professor explains that and refutes each of reason's author. He states that it is not true and there will be strong argument.
First, the author asserts that the extinction of any animal will certainly be ecological disaster is an exaggeration. However, the lecture refutes this point by saying that. He explains that dramatic shit in earth causes harm to dinosaur's life. He stating that this event changes ecosystem of earth.
Second, the article claims that genetic engineering scientists heal disease and lose of one species to extinction will not significantly harm the progress of medicine. The professor opposes this point by stating that genetic engineering is an importat field but nature is different. He explains that 40% of researchs allocate to saving of endangered species that this number is very insignificant. Sadly, most of scintists lose this researchs.
Third, the auther declars that the high cost of saving a species from extinction is often not justified. However, the lecture reject this point by montion that saving a species have adavantage. He says that 43% of American Condor extinct recently. The rest of Condor provide meet for 10000 of people. This animal deserve financial business for saving of extinction.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rt. However, the professor explains that and refutes each of reasons author. He s...
^^
Line 2, column 248, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'states'.
Suggestion: states
...earth causes harm to dinosaurs life. He stating that this event changes ecosystem of ea...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1215.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 230.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28260869565 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71698779613 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547826086957 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 365.4 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.3778322293 49.2860985944 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.9375 110.228320801 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.375 21.698381199 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 7.06452816374 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.073860354003 0.272083759551 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0274827933848 0.0996497079465 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0311443542734 0.0662205650399 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0493418174643 0.162205337803 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0104217063325 0.0443174109184 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 53.8541721854 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.0289183223 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.75 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.