: Summarize the points about Endangered Species made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading passage. You have 20 minutes to type your response.
The article states that safeguarding of endangered species is unnatural and poses a lot of draw backs. However, the professor explains that it is not true. He refutes each of author’s reasons.
First, the reading states that many claims that extinction of animals are disaster, but this is an exaggeration. The professor refutes this point by saying that it could be have too much effect on earth. He states that after dinasors dramatic changes happen and only lost even one species could alter situation enough.
Second, the article contends that with the advent of technology scientists no longer depends on nature for medication. The professor opposes this point by stating that nature play a powerful role in these days. He says that extinction of 100 species a day causes to lose opportunity for discovery.
Third, the reading claims that the huge cost of saving species is not justified. The professor refutes this by saying that 43% of a endangers species can save alotof money. He states that if we will save 10000 endangered species we can add 700 dollars to economy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 263, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'losing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: losing
... extinction of 100 species a day causes to lose opportunity for discovery. Third, the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 130, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ssor refutes this by saying that 43% of a endangers species can save alotof money...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 906.0 1373.03311258 66% => OK
No of words: 181.0 270.72406181 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00552486188 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 4.04702891845 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63080904911 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 145.348785872 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602209944751 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 419.366225166 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.2428203148 49.2860985944 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.5 110.228320801 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0833333333 21.698381199 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 7.06452816374 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122662973027 0.272083759551 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0467883584733 0.0996497079465 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0323261843226 0.0662205650399 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0738405249305 0.162205337803 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0178037837498 0.0443174109184 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.3589403974 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 63.6247240618 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.