Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Children’s education is one of the important pillar of success in their life. Kids are in the age in which they require to have a role-models and utilize their advice to be more prospers in their education. Some people believe that in today's progressive world parents have crucial role in children’s education rather than past, whereas some others hold an opposite attitude. In my view, nowadays parents spend much time on dealing with their kids’ education for two remarkable reasons.
The main reason is that in today's life parents have more free time to allocate their children’s education. In past, generally, parents had several kids which takes them a lot of time to take care of each of them and working hard to support their expenses. Also, life was really hard and people confronting the lack of necessary needs, so, parents had to spend more time on purchasing, cooking, and working far from home. For example, when I was kid, I had a huge family with several siblings. As I remember, my father had to work hard even at weekends to gain enough money and my mother always being busy in house works and taking care of my younger siblings. Therefore, none of them had time to help me in my courses. However, now, since I have only one child, not only I could spend all of my time with her, but I could involve in her education more than my parents did. Today's life provides parent's with more chance to involve in their kids’ education.
Second, nowadays parents' level of education increase which enhance their involvement in their children’s education. In majority of past societies education didn't have its own value that have today which leads to training a low educated future parents. As time goes, the significance of education is clarified, as a result today parents both have high level of education and spend time on improving their kids’ education. For instance, statistics demonstrate direct relation between parent's level of education and the time they share with their children to help them in courses. Researchers' investigation shows that since in today's life technology improve adults are more incline to continue academic education that prepare more informed parents who pay more attention to their kids’ education. If people in past had conceived the value of education, they would have bold role in their children's education.
In conclusion, I do believe that today, parents allocate more time on their kid's education. Not only do they have more free time, but they also have high level of education to understand the importance of education. I think children educational success is related to amount of time their parents spend to help them in their courses.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 113, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'In the past'?
Suggestion: In the past
...locate their children's education. In past, generally, parents had several kids wh...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 142, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'societies'' or 'society's'?
Suggestion: societies'; society's
...n's education. In majority of past societies education didnt have its own value that...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 162, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...In majority of past societies education didnt have its own value that have today whic...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, really, second, so, therefore, whereas, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, as a result, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 8.0752688172 322% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2289.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 453.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05298013245 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74323576379 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.448123620309 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 732.6 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6135572399 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324249069038 0.236089414692 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134469448944 0.076458572812 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0793077969663 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243319532839 0.150856017488 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285611716042 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.