summarize the points made in the lecture about create new stricter regulation for storing coal ash, being sure to
explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading about companies storing coal ash.
The article states that new regulation for companies producing coal ash are unnecessary and might have negative effects and provides three reasons for support. However, the professor explains that there should be strict rules for coal ash companies and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading states that effective environmental regulations already exist. The professor opposes this point by mentioning that using liner in these companies aren't satisfaction. Also, he explains that in current regulation only new landfills should be equipped to liner and there isn't any rule to oblige older landfills to add liner to their pond. There are several old landfills which cause great amount of damages to environment by coal ash leaking to ground water, so there should be new regulation to prevent all sites from damaging environments.
second, the reading claims that some analytic predict that creating strict rules might discourage the consumer to use recycling products of coal ash. However, the professor contends that strict regulation doesn't necessarily cause bad effect on consumer minds about coal ash recycling products. He explains that by looking at consumer respond through rules about other damaging products such as mercury which has a long time strict rules, over than 50 years, we can easily see people show few concerns about recycling products.
Third, the reading avers that strict new regulation would result in significant increase in disposal and handling cost for the power companies. The lecture opposes this point by indicating that although it is true that new rules increases the cost, its results worth this increase. The professor mentions that improving the situation cost companies something like 50bilion dollars, however it means one percent of average using of a house which is less cost to pay for clean the environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 166, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...ing that using liner in these companies arent satisfaction. Also, he explains that in...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 288, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...s should be equipped to liner and there isnt any rule to oblige older landfills to a...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Second
... sites from damaging environments. second, the reading claims that some analytic ...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 206, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ofessor contends that strict regulation doesnt necessarily cause bad effect on consume...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 493, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... cost to pay for clean the environment.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, look, second, so, third, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1594.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 294.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42176870748 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58522421427 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585034013605 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7062312158 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.833333333 110.228320801 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 21.698381199 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 7.06452816374 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262673124671 0.272083759551 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100359775197 0.0996497079465 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489806528843 0.0662205650399 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15941977006 0.162205337803 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488721579826 0.0443174109184 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.3589403974 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.2367328918 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.