Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Learning methods in school is one of the remarkable pillar of society which leads to its flourishing. Children are the future builder of their own country, so if they learn effectively, they would have significant role in progressing the society. Some people believe that when students do their assignments in group, their rate of learning increases in comparison with the condition they do assignments alone, whereas some others hold an opposite opinion. In my view, students who work in a group in schools could learn effectively for two noticeable reasons.
The main reason is that by doing school projects in group children get familiar with various perspectives which increase their brain efficiency. The groups in the school generally consists of different students who have both divers attitudes about their assignments and some strong and weak area of knowledge. Therefore, by combining different students in group, they have chance to complete each other and get more information. For example, when I was in high school, always I faced several obstacles in solving my assignments alone. One of our teacher forced students to share our knowledge in groups and did assignments together. At first it was really hard to get used to new situation in which every student firmly took his attitude correct and opposed others. Surprisingly, after a while, we observed that we could learn a lot and knew various aspects of projects from this debate that existed between us. As you can see, group work in school undoubtedly enhance the learning level.
Second, working in group to do assignments create competition among students which leads to better learning. When children get involve with each other to do projects, they try all the time to become bold and get the leadership position in group. This extra effort in group work increases their creativity and result in better output in learning. For instance, the statistics demonstrates that there is a direct relation between the student's level of learning and dealing in group work. The researchers' investigation among two groups of students reveals that children who do their home works in group could gain better results in their final exams due to not only they encourage to work harder in groups, but they also put more time on their projects since they enjoy to spend time with their classmates. If students had not work in group, they would not learn effectively.
In conclusion, I do believe that the benefits of doing assignments in group overweight the advantages of completing school projects alone. Not only do students get familiar with more perspectives and expand their information, but also they rising hardworking and competition level leads to better learning. I think teachers should convince students to work in group.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 491, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'researchers'' or 'researcher's'?
Suggestion: researchers'; researcher's
...learning and dealing in group work. The researchers investigation among two groups of stude...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 679, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'working'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: working
...al exams due to not only they encourage to work harder in groups, but they also put mor...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 762, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'enjoy spending'.
Suggestion: enjoy spending
... more time on their projects since they enjoy to spend time with their classmates. If students...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, really, second, so, therefore, whereas, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2356.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 454.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18942731278 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74371280999 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497797356828 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 684.9 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8893213625 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.19047619 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.619047619 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.19047619048 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31497591489 0.236089414692 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113447488405 0.076458572812 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494598790491 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227093765491 0.150856017488 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0147303252273 0.0645574589148 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.