summarize the points made in the lecture about create new stricter regulation for storing coal ash, being sure to
explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading about companies storing coal ash.
The reading states that representatives of power companies disagree with limitation rules for handling and stroing coal ash. however, the professor refutes this point by stating that it have several beneficial seting striction for activities of companies.
First, the author asserts that always effective environmental regulations exist and it is not necessary. Notwithstanding, the lecture conteds this point by explaining that harmness to surounding can be very catastrophic by companies. In addition, government should enact new law for other ways in order to prevent damage to environment such as new strict to confin leaking coal ash to soil and canataminating the surrounding environment.
Second, drastic rules can discourage the recycling coal ash into other products like generating power plant. however, the lecture rejects this point by stating that it is not indispensable. she says that we should point out how people respond this points.
Third, the passage declars that new regulation impact on prices of products directly and cause them to become expensive. While the professor agree with this part of the author's statement, but she thinks the result of these enactments is very significant and worth. she is sure that if people know this price is not matter as opposit of beneficial, they should appreciate these regulations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 126, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...ules for handling and stroing coal ash. however, the professor refutes this point by st...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ction for activities of companies. First, the author asserts that always ef...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ating the surrounding environment. Second, drastic rules can discourage the...
^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 110, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...r products like generating power plant. however, the lecture rejects this point by stat...
^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 191, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...y stating that it is not indispensable. she says that we should point out how peopl...
^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ut how people respond this points. Third, the passage declars that new regu...
^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 170, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...e professor agree with this part of the authors statement, but she thinks the result of...
^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 266, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...actments is very significant and worth. she is sure that if people know this price ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, third, while, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1168.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 208.0 270.72406181 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61538461538 5.08290768461 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01383643537 2.5805825403 117% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.629807692308 0.540411800872 117% => OK
syllable_count: 342.0 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.8870266992 49.2860985944 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.181818182 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9090909091 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45454545455 7.06452816374 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215455845623 0.272083759551 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770576433969 0.0996497079465 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461083090589 0.0662205650399 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130717203953 0.162205337803 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490513228647 0.0443174109184 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.2367328918 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.