Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Boys and girls should attend separate schools. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Schools are important part of the educational system. As students spend most of their life in school, it could have effects on students' personality and future. Some people believe that boys and girls should not study in same schools, but others hold an opposite opinion. In my view, it's better for students to study in coed schools for two remarkable reasons.
First, students could increase their educational efficiency by studying in the coed schools. When boys and girls study in the same classes a natural competition create between them, increasing their effort, which leads to their more educational efficiency. For example, when I was in university, I worked in a group that determined factors for increasing the efficiency of students. In order to this, we examined 20 students. At first we separated boys and girls in two different class, and recorded their grades in various courses through on month. In second step, we joined them in the same class, without changing the other variables. We could clearly observe that students’ involvement in class improved a lot, and they became more active and motivated. After comparing the results, without doubt, the second class had more educational efficiency. As you can see, studying in coed schools have good benefits.
Second, students studying in coed schools have successful marriage. If boys and girls study in same school, they will gain a good knowledge about the opposite sex. Therefore, they could make a better decision for their future life. For instance, a study among successful families shows that people who studied in coed schools have a low rate of divorce in their marriage. Scientists claim that since in these schools’ students start to communicate with different sex, they can become familiar about emotional feeling, special behavior and other characteristics of opposite sex. As students are in younger age, they could adapt better with differences and will grow with this knowledge. Therefore, they are more open-minded and could make a logical decision. Furthermore, these successful parents train better children in both educational and social aspects that create a prosperous society. If people had not study in coed schools, they wouldn't have a successful life.
In conclusion, though some people agree with separating boys and girls in schools, it's beneficial for students to study in same schools. Not only does it increase the educational efficiency, but it also causes a successful marriage. I think every society should have coed schools in their educational system.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 128, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ife in school, it could have effects on students personality and future. Some people bel...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 915, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'studied'.
Suggestion: studied
...a prosperous society. If people had not study in coed schools, they wouldnt have a su...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 943, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...ple had not study in coed schools, they wouldnt have a successful life. In conclus...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 310, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed schools in their educational system.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, second, so, therefore, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 15.1003584229 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2174.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 408.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32843137255 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77669901679 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482843137255 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 646.2 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.6519631125 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.96 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.32 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0958565895634 0.236089414692 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0322860685481 0.076458572812 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525592729302 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0837214810455 0.150856017488 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492070714225 0.0645574589148 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.