integrated writing TPO 40
The reading indicates that situations on Venus are inhospitable and humans can't be there. The author listed three factors supporting this idea. However, the speaker finds all the reasons dubious and presents some evidence to refute all of them.
First, the author proposes the pressure on Venus is 90 times more than the earth, in other words, this pressure destroys everything on Venus's s surface. Conversely, the speaker rebuts this idea and declares that they cab establish station floating on the surface like a balloon. Also, he states by increasing the height of the atmosphere the pressure decreases.
Second, the reading passage points out that there are no reservoirs of water on the surface, then it is not possible to import sufficient oxygen and water to it. In contrast, the speaker casts doubt on this idea by standing that oxygen and water can be formed by combining carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid. Therefore, he rejects this claim too.
Last but not least the author argues due to the thick cloud, the little sunlight reaches to the planet, besides more than half of it will be reflected. Consequently, they encounter a lack of energy. On the contrary, the speaker dismisses these issues by illustrating that clouds are not thick above the planet and they can use from reflected and absorbed sunlight to produce energy and generate power.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 76, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ns on Venus are inhospitable and humans cant be there. The author listed three facto...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, conversely, first, however, second, so, then, therefore, in contrast, in other words, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1137.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 226.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03097345133 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5277069087 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615044247788 0.540411800872 114% => OK
syllable_count: 347.4 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.8745648825 49.2860985944 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.75 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8333333333 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.25 7.06452816374 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292003518726 0.272083759551 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0864167107996 0.0996497079465 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066209372355 0.0662205650399 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152328738053 0.162205337803 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0263639657316 0.0443174109184 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.