TPO 19 integrated writing
The reading discusses that buzzing has created many controversies so many critics would like to see it banned, hence, the author listed three critics. However, the lecturer finds all the critics dubious and presents some evidence to refute all of them.
First, the author mentioned that consumers should know the person praising a product is being paid to praise. On the other hand, the speaker dismissed this critic and asserts that the company finds the user of its product, thus, it is not an ordinary advertisement. For example, the phone company gets a true buzzer that used this product before and was satisfied.
Furthermore, the author points out that they pretend to be a private individual. In contrast, the speaker casts doubt on this issue and states that people can ask a lot of questions about price, services and other things and if the person did not answer them and does not have enough knowledge about them they can refuse to purchase it.
last but not least, the reading passage proposes that it has a harmful effect on civilization. On the contrary, in contradictions with the reading material, the speaker declares that can ask buzzer about phone number, service consumer, good expensive and other things to trust the buzzer and be sure the person is trustworthy. In conclusion, according to the listening material, the argument that criticizes the buzzer is rejected.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Last
...m they can refuse to purchase it. last but not least, the reading passage prop...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1174.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 231.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08225108225 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62274076845 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584415584416 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 347.4 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.4770388938 49.2860985944 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.4 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1 21.698381199 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0 7.06452816374 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282147847583 0.272083759551 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101051909916 0.0996497079465 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0654137955077 0.0662205650399 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147418023478 0.162205337803 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475376631199 0.0443174109184 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.3589403974 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.