Integrated writing TPO41
The reading and the listening have a conflict of opinions with regard to the necessity of strict regulations for dealing with and storing coal ash. The writer indicates that new regulations are unnecessary and provides some reasons for this statement, while the lecturer disputes those passage ideas with several proofs.
First of all, the author asserts that effective environmental regulations already exist and companies that dispose of coal ash must use liner in every new pond or landfill they build. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that these are not sufficient and he states that the old ponds must be replaced by the new one. According to his ideas, it is dangerous to leak the oil into the soil from the older ponds and it is needed to have a regulation to obligate buying new ones with new size to prevent this damaging effect.
Furthermore, the reading holds the view that insisting on strict regulation will cause the discouraging of recycling of coal ash into other products. On the contrary, the professor underlies the fact that this action might be lead to producing other hazardous product like mercury which is a material can store in the environment for a long time and will be problematic for the recycling process. Therefore, needless to say that strict regulation must be enacting to diminish these consequences.
Finally, the reading argues that strict new regulation will climb the cost of disposal and handling of the power companies. In contrast, the speaker dismisses this issue with the fact that new regulation can easily handle the expenses of the extra expenditures with transforming the cost of the household electrical bill which is just one percent to compensate effectively the expenses of cleaning environmental that deems is the much more important issue.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, furthermore, so, therefore, while, in contrast, first of all, on the contrary, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1516.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 296.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12162162162 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78492334325 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560810810811 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 21.2450331126 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.6216681926 49.2860985944 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.6 110.228320801 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6 21.698381199 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1 7.06452816374 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.428102238042 0.272083759551 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169885223954 0.0996497079465 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100037263063 0.0662205650399 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241887766507 0.162205337803 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0609814616296 0.0443174109184 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.3589403974 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 53.8541721854 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.0289183223 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.01 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.498013245 130% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.