integrated43
Both the reading and the lecture several theories about how agnostids may have lived. In the reading section, the writer contends that agnostids were free-swimming predators, seafloor dwellers and parasites; however, the professor casts doubt on reading points by indicating that each three theories have serious weakness.
First of all, the writer claims that agnostids which were other types of primitive athropods could prey on smaller organisms in ocean; in contrast, the professor rejects this notion by stating that agnostids could not be predators because, predators had strong eyes to attak their praise while agnostids had poorly blinds eye. Moreover, other sensing organs could not be find in fossils to support Predators theory.
In addition, the reading passage holds the view that since other types of primitive arthropods have dwelled on seafloor, agnostids may have dwelled on the seafloor too; on the contrary, the lecturer underlines the fact that sea floor species were localized and they did not have ability to move fast or far from the place where were originated. On the other hand, agnostids spread in the ocean and could move fast.
Moreover, the writer mentions that agnostids were parasites because many species of modern-day arthropods were parasites; conversely, the professor indicates that agnostids could not be parasites because too many different types of agnostids' fossils found while parasites were limited in population since they killed each other.
Comments
Essay evaluation report by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 209, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...tids could not be parasites because too many different types of agnostids fossils found while ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['conversely', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'well', 'while', 'in addition', 'in contrast', 'first of all', 'on the contrary', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.283464566929 0.261695866417 108% => OK
Verbs: 0.173228346457 0.158904122519 109% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0748031496063 0.0723426182421 103% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0551181102362 0.0435111971325 127% => OK
Pronouns: 0.011811023622 0.0277247811725 43% => OK
Prepositions: 0.137795275591 0.128828473217 107% => OK
Participles: 0.0472440944882 0.0370669169778 127% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.53400689152 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.011811023622 0.0208969081088 57% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0905511811024 0.128158765124 71% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0275590551181 0.0158828679856 174% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0157480314961 0.0114777025283 137% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1489.0 1645.83664459 90% => OK
No of words: 230.0 271.125827815 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.47391304348 6.08160592843 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 4.04852973271 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.417391304348 0.374372842146 111% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.347826086957 0.287516216867 121% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.24347826087 0.187439937562 130% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.195652173913 0.113142543107 173% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53400689152 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534782608696 0.539623497131 99% => OK
Word variations: 49.9183548811 53.8517498576 93% => OK
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0529801325 54% => OK
Sentence length: 32.8571428571 21.7502111507 151% => OK
Sentence length SD: 117.332077142 49.3711431718 238% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 212.714285714 132.220823453 161% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.8571428571 21.7502111507 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 0.878197800319 228% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 67.6397515528 50.5018328374 134% => OK
Elegance: 1.95081967213 1.90840788429 102% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.549887131256 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.203674897687 0.142949733639 142% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0892261492017 0.0787303798458 113% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.795336673558 0.631733273073 126% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.175232198946 0.139662658121 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.266732575781 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.103435571967 0% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.259774476665 0.414875509568 63% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0352900587075 0.0530846634433 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.40443939384 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0528353158467 0% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.26048565121 23% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 7.0 10.2958057395 68% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 209, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...tids could not be parasites because too many different types of agnostids fossils found while ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['conversely', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'well', 'while', 'in addition', 'in contrast', 'first of all', 'on the contrary', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.283464566929 0.261695866417 108% => OK
Verbs: 0.173228346457 0.158904122519 109% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0748031496063 0.0723426182421 103% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0551181102362 0.0435111971325 127% => OK
Pronouns: 0.011811023622 0.0277247811725 43% => OK
Prepositions: 0.137795275591 0.128828473217 107% => OK
Participles: 0.0472440944882 0.0370669169778 127% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.53400689152 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.011811023622 0.0208969081088 57% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0905511811024 0.128158765124 71% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0275590551181 0.0158828679856 174% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0157480314961 0.0114777025283 137% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1489.0 1645.83664459 90% => OK
No of words: 230.0 271.125827815 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.47391304348 6.08160592843 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 4.04852973271 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.417391304348 0.374372842146 111% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.347826086957 0.287516216867 121% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.24347826087 0.187439937562 130% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.195652173913 0.113142543107 173% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53400689152 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534782608696 0.539623497131 99% => OK
Word variations: 49.9183548811 53.8517498576 93% => OK
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0529801325 54% => OK
Sentence length: 32.8571428571 21.7502111507 151% => OK
Sentence length SD: 117.332077142 49.3711431718 238% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 212.714285714 132.220823453 161% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.8571428571 21.7502111507 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 0.878197800319 228% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 67.6397515528 50.5018328374 134% => OK
Elegance: 1.95081967213 1.90840788429 102% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.549887131256 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.203674897687 0.142949733639 142% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0892261492017 0.0787303798458 113% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.795336673558 0.631733273073 126% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.175232198946 0.139662658121 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.266732575781 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.103435571967 0% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.259774476665 0.414875509568 63% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0352900587075 0.0530846634433 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.40443939384 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0528353158467 0% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.26048565121 23% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 7.0 10.2958057395 68% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.