Interpretations of the evidences in T. Rex bones
The article states that there is very little opportunity for scientists to examine actual animal tissues found in the fossils because they are largely replaced by minerals. However, in a recent study where scientist opened a leg bone of T. Rex, they found evidences of these tissues. The author interprets three of these evidences and relates them to the tissues but the professor does not agree with his statements and criticize each of these interpretations with his own.
First, the author relates small branching channels inside the bone to blood vessels. However, the professor claims that after death of an animal the bacteria colonize in the corpse and these channels my contribute to the trace of residue of these bacteria.
Second evidence discussed in the passage is about microscopic spheres found inside the bone which the reading relates it to the red blood cells due to the iron in them. But the professor states that other fossils' of prior animals have been found beforehand which also had these spheres. However, these animals did not have blood vessels in their body. Hence, this observations makes him to believe those are related to something else such as some reddish minerals.
Furthermore, the author claims that there was collagen on these bones according to the tests. However, the lecturer doubts this statement and claims that the collagen can last up to 100,000 years. Since, these bones are form 70 million years ago it contradicts all our knowledge about collagen. He believes that this material may belong to the hands of the researchers who were working in this study because collagen also can be found in the skin of the human too.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 360, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ave blood vessels in their body. Hence, this observations makes him to believe those...
^^^^
Line 7, column 198, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... collagen can last up to 100,000 years. Since, these bones are form 70 million years ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, may, second, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1392.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 278.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0071942446 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47492732326 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575539568345 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0009427588 49.2860985944 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4285714286 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.07142857143 7.06452816374 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190328639926 0.272083759551 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657509085342 0.0996497079465 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0786252806402 0.0662205650399 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107784301046 0.162205337803 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0853918654146 0.0443174109184 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.