Limitations of archaeology in United Kingdom
<p class="MsoNormal">The passage states that there are many limitations for
archaeology in the United Kingdom and specificly talked about three of them.
However, the lecturer opposes this idea and avers that there is new guidelines
approved by government to help these issues mention in the passage.</p><p class="MsoNormal">First, the announcement claims that because of constructions
many of these anciant sites are either being held un-discovered or destroyed,
Despite, the professor states that in the mentioned guideline, the initiation
of any construction in UK is restricted to primary axaminations of that
site in order to preserve those valuable
artifacts.</p><p class="MsoNormal">Furthermore, the passage states that, archaelogy is
suffering from the lack of financial support and believes that, this amount
financial supplies are inadequate. However, the professor claims that the new
guideline has made the construction companies, to pay for the examinations
before any construction initialization. As a result, this fact have been turned
into a great apportunity to many more discoveries than before.</p><p class="MsoNormal">At the end, in the passage, it was complained that there is
very few jobs available for archaelogists and many of them ending up persuing
other careers. Nevertheless, the professor refutes this claim. He states that
because of the prior obligatory examinations, there is a lot of new works and
jobs available for archaelogists than before, from esaminations to research and
finally proccessing these data and writing reports for them.<o:p></o:p></p>
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 56, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are new guidelines'?
Suggestion: there are new guidelines
...cturer opposes this idea and avers that there is new guidelines approved by government to help these i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1443.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 230.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.27391304348 5.08290768461 123% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 5.03755461725 2.5805825403 195% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604347826087 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.55342163355 122% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 2.5761589404 311% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 13.0662251656 46% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 21.2450331126 179% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 218.971839894 49.2860985944 444% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 240.5 110.228320801 218% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 38.3333333333 21.698381199 177% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8333333333 7.06452816374 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 19.0 4.09492273731 464% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0727103743092 0.272083759551 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0574798232863 0.0996497079465 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128528792203 0.0662205650399 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0241166937631 0.162205337803 15% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0847247279414 0.0443174109184 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 27.3 13.3589403974 204% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 7.53 53.8541721854 14% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 5.55761589404 263% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 21.7 11.0289183223 197% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 19.68 12.2367328918 161% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.4 8.42419426049 123% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 31.0 10.7273730684 289% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.498013245 164% => OK
text_standard: 31.0 11.2008830022 277% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.