The reading and the lecture are both about Broccoli which grow in cooled regeons in the West Coast. More specifically, in regard to the passage, the writer presents three theories about the advantages of cultivating Broccoli in the West Coast. The lecturer disputes the claims made in the article. His position is that there are no sucssefull benefits from this new type.
First and foremost, the author of the reading states producing Broccoli locally in the West Coast will decline the coast for cosumers. The article mentions that the coat of transporting the Broccoli will be removed, so the cost will be lower. This argument is challenged by the lecturer. He claims that new palnting of Broccoli not paramount to be cheaper because in the West the vegetable yield lower, so the farmers will sell them in higher price. Additionally, he points out that this increase in the price will cancel the reduction in the transportation cost.
Secondly, the author suggests that the new type will be more desirable for the consumers because it produced using genetic modification. In the article, it is said that the new Broccoli has some features like resistance to the hoot solar. Again, the professor specifically addresses this point when he states the fund for this new type is from the same frims from the past that the people have a bad experience with them. He goes on to say that people will reject this new product because it has a realtion with these corporations.
Finally, the author brings his argument to a close by suggesting that the recent Broccoli can be eaten directly whhich means more nutrients, in comparison with the last type which loss its benefical. Not surprisingly, the lecturer takes issue with this claim by contending that new Broccoli is not crucial to be high nutrient and there are many vegetables in the East have high value of nutrients. He notes that kale is producing in East and it has many advantages, so instead of spend this amount of money on research it is better to educate people about the high nutrients vegetables in local cities.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 30.3222958057 152% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1723.0 1373.03311258 125% => OK
No of words: 354.0 270.72406181 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86723163842 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63455148026 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 529.2 419.366225166 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8671269234 49.2860985944 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.6875 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 7.06452816374 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186327797395 0.272083759551 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635508937954 0.0996497079465 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0314253931656 0.0662205650399 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114706812185 0.162205337803 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0294403525578 0.0443174109184 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 63.6247240618 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.