Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject

No one can deny that there are both positive and negative aspects of having advanced knowledge of many academic subjects. If I were force to choose, I would definitely select specializing in one topic. It is my firm belief the person who has specific and detailed information about one subject can obtain enormous pros for a number of reasons and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.

To begin with, experienced persone who can gather a lot of information on odd subjects may not have the position who diserve because knowing minor details about specific subject is the required to most corporations. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my own personal experience. six years ago, after graduation from the university I coscioused that frims prefre the person who has knowledge in specific tasks because each person has his own responsibility to achieve the goals for the company. As a result, I have initiated to take advanced courses and workshops to be specific in project management. Moreover, the topics that I learned were around how to make a schedule for the project within the time and the cost that determined before. In the past, my major was a general engineer, but now I have more knowledge in one outstanding position using the tools and techniques that I learned before. Consequently, I am now working in a massive corporation and I have many offers from other companies around the world.
Secondly, because of the high competition between students, the attend to complete their graduate study to have plenty of opportunities. Drawing from my experience.professors in our colleges or universites are all specialized in one minor topic to learn skills and information to the students. My friend who graduate with me, decided to complete his study in pavement materials and its properitesin one university in United states of America, so he took more knowledge than the people in the market . Therefore, nowadays he worked at a university as a lecturer.

In conclusion, I strongly feel that be specialized in one subject is better. This is because can give an opportunity to find superior jobs and enhance the salary and allow to learn other students about the detailed information that acquired throgh the years.

Votes
Average: 8.1 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 326, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Six
...fluenced by my own personal experience. six years ago, after graduation from the un...
^^^
Line 4, column 61, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... the high competition between students, the attend to complete their graduate study to hav...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 498, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... knowledge than the people in the market . Therefore, nowadays he worked at a univ...
^^
Line 6, column 173, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'learning'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: learning
...r jobs and enhance the salary and allow to learn other students about the detailed infor...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1916.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 381.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02887139108 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00869512826 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55905511811 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 631.8 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1451930508 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.75 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8125 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23773065545 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772730537308 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662808985159 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145037090808 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0426859604466 0.0645574589148 66% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.