The reading and the lecture are both about farming tuna in cages to enhance their numbers and then selling them. More specifically, in regard to the passage, the writer presents three theories about the issues facing farming tuna. The lecturer disputes the claims made in the article. His position is that researchers found new solutions to deal with these issues.
First and foremost, the author of the reading states female tuna cannot lay eggs in cages. As result, farmers need to catch an enormous number of wild tuna. The article mentions that this procedure will affect and reduce tuna in the ocean. This argument is challenged by the lecturer. He claims that scientists found a hormone that can inject into female tuna which cannot make any effect on either tuna's health or the consumers. Additionally, he points out that by using this hormone tuna's population will not decline.
Secondly, the author suggests farming tuna is costly because tuna's diet depends on protein which is excluded from other fish. In the article, it is said that individual tuna needs 70 kilograms every day of food. Again, the professor specifically addresses this point when he states tuna took protein not only from fish but also from other types of plants. He goes on to say that plants can provide tuna with protein at a low cost. Consequently, the cost of producing tuna will not rise.
Finally, the author brings his argument to a close by suggesting that in cages tuna can infest by a parasite that affects tuna and decrease their growth. Not surprisingly, the lecturer takes issue with this claim by contending that scientists asserted that blood vessels can reduce by moving tuna to the deepest water instead of putting them offshore. He notes that because of the resources they needed to live blood flukes absent in the deep water this disease will stop.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 400, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'tunas'' or 'tuna's'?
Suggestion: tunas'; tuna's
... which cannot make any effect on either tunas health or the consumers. Additionally, ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, then, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 313.0 270.72406181 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93290734824 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39509667295 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 145.348785872 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575079872204 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.3718032212 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.7777777778 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3888888889 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72222222222 7.06452816374 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272035820439 0.272083759551 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0897338241135 0.0996497079465 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572844461606 0.0662205650399 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166462530945 0.162205337803 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267741955235 0.0443174109184 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 63.6247240618 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.