The reading and the lecture are both about artificial reefs that nade of enormous materials. More specifically, in regard to the passage, the writer presents three theories about the pros of establishing fake reef. The lecturer disputes the claims made in the article. His position is that these new reefs will make more problems than benefits.
First and foremost, the author of the reading states artificial reefs can enhance the competition to the small fishers who compete with the large firms. The article mentions that this new area will provide encouragement to the small fishers, so they can help their society. This argument is chaleenged by the lecturer. He claims that it is not necessary to increase the overall population for all fish, because artificial reefs will atract the fish from many places to stay in distance location. Additionally, he points out that this will decline the fish population.
Secondly, the author suggests an asteroid colony is valuable of many raw materials. In the article, it is said that the sponsores of these colonies will pay more to mining these minerals and back them to earth. Again, the professor specifically addresses this point when he states establish these reefs in secreat locations will cause safety problems. He goes on to say that make these reefs in know place will not make a good competition for the small fishers.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, secondly, so, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1155.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 228.0 270.72406181 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06578947368 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62309670993 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587719298246 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 352.8 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.7708757279 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.8461538462 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5384615385 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.46153846154 7.06452816374 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12673882459 0.272083759551 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0428788883278 0.0996497079465 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0320322516343 0.0662205650399 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0859947059838 0.162205337803 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335984823348 0.0443174109184 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.3589403974 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.