Selling fossils to private collectors
The lecture states that the purchase of the fossiles by private collectors is a negative point and supports it with three reasons however the professor in the lecture believe that this is good and refutes each of the reasons.
Fisrt, the passage claims that by purchase of fossile by private owners, public visitors won't have access to them and as a result the fossils will be less observed, but the professor refutes this idea and states that with private collectors in this market, there will be more opportunity for fossils to be exposed to public; this way any school and meusum will have the chance to buy and expose a fossile to public.
Second, the article states that scientists who will benefit the most from the researches they are doing on fossiles, will lose their connection with them and so the important scientific aspects will be lost. However the professor avers that all of the discoveries are carried out by researchers and after fossiles being examined be them and passed through this channel, will be sold. So there will be no data that will be missed for scientists.
Third, the reading claims that there are some facts that scientists pay attention to and the private collector are not aware of, such as their places and the way they lay on ground and so on. In this manner, private owners do not pay attentiion to them and an important aspect would be lost. However the lecture states that although this fact may be a deffiency, but it is attracting collector’s attention and as they investigating lots of money on this, there will be more oppotunity to find fossils and benefit from its scientific aspects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve that this is good and refutes each of the reasons. Fisrt, the passage claims ...
^^
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ortant scientific aspects will be lost. However the professor avers that all of the dis...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 241, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... lost. However the professor avers that all of the discoveries are carried out by research...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 292, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... and an important aspect would be lost. However the lecture states that although this f...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, second, so, third, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 7.30242825607 233% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1359.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 283.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80212014134 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54397820246 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491166077739 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 413.1 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 21.2450331126 165% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 100.176016965 49.2860985944 203% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 169.875 110.228320801 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.375 21.698381199 163% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06452816374 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207058749834 0.272083759551 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101626131495 0.0996497079465 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0842718065579 0.0662205650399 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16308435881 0.162205337803 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.084094838559 0.0443174109184 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.3589403974 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.41 53.8541721854 82% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.0289183223 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 26.0 10.7273730684 242% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.498013245 152% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.2008830022 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.