Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Determining the most effective method for student assignments is a very important matter. Knowing this will help teachers and educational managers to figure out the best method for improving students' knowledge. Some students and teachers may think that group assignments are more effective while others would disagree. In my opinion, working in groups on projects is the best method for few important reasons from which I will briefly discuss two reasons.
The main reason is that students interact with each other more efficiently. In group studies, students need to talk and debate about various things and even in controversial topics where each individual have his own prospective they may debate on issues. These conversations are themselves a helper for students to shape their insight into the field of study.
Furthermore, it helps them learn from other's point of views and weigh each student's method to solve the problem. For example, several years ago, in one of my mechanical design classes the professor assigned us a project to design the suspension system for a specific vehicle. In this project we had to learn different suspension systems and more specifically those that were used in vehicles. There were four of us in our group and each of us started to research on that. After a while everyone presented his own idea to design the system and surprisingly all of them was different, so, we started to learn each other's design and I got very useful ideas from them that I was not even thinking that the problem can be solved like that. As a result, since then, I tried to design from their prospective which brought me great success in my carrier. This experience taught me that working in groups is the most beneficial method.
The other reason is that students might learn not only the project but also other related topics in group studies. It is clear that to solve a problem, one has to learn and examine various methods and finally come up with the best answer. In the process of try-and-error one can learn lots of useful things. When working with others on the same projects the methods being examined is much more rather than working alone, hence, they encounter with more methods and learn more things. For instance, in another project for the mentioned design course, we started to work on a design altogether, everyone had his idea and different ideas was being examined. We studied some methods that seemed odd to me but we succeeded and I learned new thing in the field. As you can see, group studies helped me to encounter and learn with much more methods.
In sum, though some may disagree with my idea, but I deeply believe that one can benefit much more when working with others. Not only do you learn other's perspectives but also you learn beyond the project. Educational managers should promote the teachers to use this kind of assignments more than individual ones.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 76, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...om others point of views and weigh each students method to solve the problem. For exampl...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, finally, furthermore, hence, if, may, so, then, while, as to, for example, for instance, kind of, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2420.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 495.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88888888889 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71684168287 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52826486997 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.466666666667 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 729.9 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9046099569 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.833333333 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300419017259 0.236089414692 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0924510330974 0.076458572812 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640353369058 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1878678237 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660082687827 0.0645574589148 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.