Advantages and disadvantages of selling fossils discovery to private collectors.
The reading and the lecturer talked about the advantages and disadvantages of selling fossils to private collectors. According to the reading, the hunting of fossils has turned into a great commercial business since the 18 century and people pay millions of dollars to own them. Thus, this action has been wretched to scientists and public people.
The lecture and the reading both agree that if private collectors keep owning all the petrified remains of ancient organisms, the interest of people to visit museums might drop. The lecturer thinks that the public should have more exposure to the fossil than less.
The passages stated that buyers are likely to pay huge sums of money just to own the rarest fossils discoveries, which gives disadvantages to museums and scientists to learn about extinct life forms. The lecturer disputed this point.
In contrast to the passage, the lecturer argued that scientists have to examine in detail the fossils first in order to be priced. Consequently, buyers cannot obtain fossils if scientists have not studied the fossils. The discoveries of fossils are being commercial so that made it easy for buyers to acquire them. Also, some institutions for example libraries and museums could obtain fossils as well to be displayed in their facility for the public.
Lastly, the passages claimed If fossils were given directly to collectors, they might have destroyed valuable evidence because they are uninterested in the meticulous evidence of the fossils. Meanwhile, the lecturer said that there are many fossils remaining undiscovered because scientists have not found the proper evidence yet. Therefore, scientists keep the fossils until they have performed the proper studies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 262, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve more exposure to the fossil than less The passages stated that buyers are like...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...re exposure to the fossil than less The passages stated that buyers are likely ...
^^^
Line 5, column 231, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e forms The lecturer disputed this point In contrast to the passage the lecturer ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 445, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...splayed in their facility for the public Lastly the passages claimed If fossils w...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 409, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l they have performed the proper studies
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, if, lastly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1436.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 272.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27941176471 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5978160744 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518382352941 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 13.0662251656 8% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 272.0 21.2450331126 1280% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.2860985944 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1436.0 110.228320801 1303% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 272.0 21.698381199 1254% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 113.0 7.06452816374 1600% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307972231647 0.272083759551 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.307972231647 0.0996497079465 309% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159552034381 0.162205337803 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.064558901744 0.0443174109184 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 139.4 13.3589403974 1043% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -204.6 53.8541721854 -380% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 5.55761589404 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 109.4 11.0289183223 992% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.82 12.2367328918 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 20.84 8.42419426049 247% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 53.0 10.7273730684 494% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 110.8 10.498013245 1055% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 53.0 11.2008830022 473% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.