Traditional encyclopaedias vs online
Communal online encyclopedias have been one of the latest contributions to society. According to the reading, articles and information found on the internet can be altered or deleted by any users. These types of problems would never happen in a printed encyclopedia.
To begin with, the reading stated that online encyclopedias their information is not hundred percent accurate, and also lacks academic credentials. Traditional encyclopedias were written by experts which had the required knowledge. The lecturer argued this point. The online encyclopedia is not perfect, and the chances of making errors are impossible to avoid. However, the advantage of the online encyclopedia is that errors can be corrected quickly, while the conventional encyclopedia errors would take decades to correct.
Furthermore, the reading passages stated that online encyclopaedias are easy to get corrupted by hackers which in traditional encyclopedias is not possible. The lecturer mentioned that there are different ways to protect important information from hackers. The crucial fact of encyclopedias, protected them from hackers because it does not allow anyone to make any change to the original information. Moreover, online encyclopedias have people who supervise any changes made in articles and if they find malicious information, they eliminate these changes.
Lastly, the passages hold that popular information online focuses on the depth of the information and provides false impressions to the readers about what is important and what is not. Nevertheless, the lecturer argues that the diversity of the articles is what makes the online information valuable. Moreover, the online encyclopaedias provide enough space for writers to write all the details of the articles or information. On the other hand, traditional encyclopedias had limited space and only contain what the group of experts decide what is important and what is not. Thus, this contradicts what the passages stated.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-16 | TiOluwani97 | 87 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | Shimakaze514 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | Shimakaze514 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-19 | Yash Mehta | 85 | view |
| 2023-08-19 | Yash Mehta | 80 | view |
- Some people like to travel with a companion Other people prefer to travel alone Which do you prefer Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice 63
- Some people think that family is the most important influence on young adults Other people think that friends are the most important influence on young adults Which view do you agree with Use examples to support your position 60
- COMICS 73
- Advantages of working as a team and argues by the lecturer 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement A teacher s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 263, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d never happen in a printed encyclopedia To begin with the reading stated that on...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
... encyclopedias their information is not hundred percent accurate and also lacks academi...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 517, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dia errors would take decades to correct Furthermore the reading passages stated ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...rrors would take decades to correct Furthermore the reading passages stated that online...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 549, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...information they eliminate these changes Lastly the passages hold that popular in...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 614, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...his contradicts what the passages stated
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, lastly, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1659.0 1373.03311258 121% => OK
No of words: 298.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56711409396 5.08290768461 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04902844831 2.5805825403 118% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506711409396 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 541.8 419.366225166 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 8.23620309051 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 13.0662251656 8% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 298.0 21.2450331126 1403% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.2860985944 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1659.0 110.228320801 1505% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 298.0 21.698381199 1373% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 118.0 7.06452816374 1670% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187779095648 0.272083759551 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.187779095648 0.0996497079465 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113681899253 0.162205337803 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376540650601 0.0443174109184 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 153.8 13.3589403974 1151% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -247.91 53.8541721854 -460% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 5.55761589404 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 121.9 11.0289183223 1105% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 16.51 12.2367328918 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 22.02 8.42419426049 261% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 63.0 10.7273730684 587% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 121.2 10.498013245 1155% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 122.0 11.2008830022 1089% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.