the Little Ice Age
The material discusses the possible causes of the Little Ice Age. While the reading looks at the topic from one perspective, the listening challenges certain points outlined in the reading passage.
First, the reading claims that the cool climate happened due to oceans' disruption. On the contrary, the lecture opposes this and says that oceans' disruption occurred only in Europe and North America; however, the temperature was cold also in other areas, such as New Zealand and South Africa. Thus, this theory could not explain the cooling climate in these areas.
Second, the author mentions that volcanic eruption caused the Little Ice Age. One the other hand, the lecturer contradicts this and states that it is right that volcanic eruption could produce enough dust that causes cool climate, but it should produce also striking visual effects and change snow color to gray or brown. However, there is no report that these conditions happened during the same period, so volcanic eruption was not strong enough to lower global temperature.
Third, the reading posits that cool-climate happened due to a decline in human populations. In contrast, the professor challenges this and says that there was not enough time to cause cold temperature because human populations grew back quickly and cut down trees to cultivate more crops to feed more populations. Hence, none of these theories lasted a long time to cause a cooling climate.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 140, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'oceans'' or 'ocean's'?
Suggestion: oceans'; ocean's
... the lecture opposes this and says that oceans disruption occurred only in Europe and ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 392, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a long time to cause a cooling climate.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, look, second, so, third, thus, while, in contrast, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1208.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 232.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20689655172 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48308412019 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590517241379 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 371.7 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.0418251762 49.2860985944 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.818181818 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0909090909 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.90909090909 7.06452816374 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139745570276 0.272083759551 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0885479551791 0.0996497079465 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.188520739308 0.0662205650399 285% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101355462454 0.162205337803 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109071961327 0.0443174109184 246% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.