Well, the professor starts by saying that each of the arguments explained in the passage can be challenged. Although some might think these policies will be effective she disagree for the following reasons.
Alghough the governments think that by increasing the tax, the people will be dicouraged to use segarettes and hunlealthy foods, the professors theorizes that by increasing the taxes the people who are addictedd to segarettes will try to find cheaper and irregular made segarettes and this will put them in danger more. Similarly, she claims that some people who like to serve unhealthy food when the taxes are high still use it and this will cause to lose more money and finally there will no money remain for them to pay for their health care.
The second, the theory that high taxes on segarettes and unhealthy foods is fair for the health treatment of the ones who are addicted is rejected by the professor somehow. She beleives that it is not fair action regarding the segarettes addicted people. She gives an example, if two people are using segarettes one is with low income and the other ones is high income so, both of them use the segarettes and pay the same taxes so, it seems not to be fair.
The final theory which given in the passage also criticized by the professor. Although the government uses the taxes from segarettes and unhelathy food for the projects that benefit the public walfare, then these taxes will be count as one of the way the government can earn and add to their yearly budget. Therefore the government will not be interested to lose this amount of money and they will not make a plan to avoid the usage of segarette at all.
To conclude that, these policies are not useful and functional for the health of the society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 172, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'disagrees'.
Suggestion: disagrees
...nk these policies will be effective she disagree for the following reasons. Alghough ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 195, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...that by increasing the taxes the people who are addictedd to segarettes will try to fin...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 450, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'losing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: losing
...e high still use it and this will cause to lose more money and finally there will no mo...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 308, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...an earn and add to their yearly budget. Therefore the government will not be interested t...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, regarding, second, similarly, so, still, then, therefore, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1463.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 309.0 270.72406181 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73462783172 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44960518401 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485436893204 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 459.0 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.1053527472 49.2860985944 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 110.228320801 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0909090909 21.698381199 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36363636364 7.06452816374 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207194494996 0.272083759551 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.083145854591 0.0996497079465 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0701978372645 0.0662205650399 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113046660567 0.162205337803 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050545071396 0.0443174109184 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 53.8541721854 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.