The professors starts by saying that, although the theory that the humpback whales are navigating the stars is a fascinating thing but the reasons provided in the passage are not enough strong. He thinks that reasons given in the passage are not acceptable. The professors then discusses on the reasons.
First of all, in the passage it is mentioned that the whales are the most intelligent animals than others which have a complex brain system that make them able to use the stars for navigation while migrating. However the professor does not agree with this theory. The professor believes that there are other animals which navigate the stars such as some types of birds. Therefore, this is not a specific capability for the humpback whales.
Second, based on the passage the humpback whales are keeping their movement straight while migrating, while there is no any external pathway to follow except using stars. But the professor thinks different, he believes that most of the animals are sensitive to the magnetic fields, therefore it could be possible that the whales are also going straight forward while migration based on this characterization.
The third one, Although the passage says that spy-hopping is a specific action done by these whales in order to see the stars and navigate the stars while immigration, the professor does not accept this. He says that there are other animals which are doing the spy-hopping action such as sharks, but they do not use this for migration purpose. Therefore, the spy-hopping could be done for purposes rather than navigating the stars for migration.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 16, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'start'.
Suggestion: start
The professors starts by saying that, although the theory tha...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 210, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...e stars for navigation while migrating. However the professor does not agree with this ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 118, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...traight while migrating, while there is no any external pathway to follow except u...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, then, therefore, third, while, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1347.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 264.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10227272727 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60691659216 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.481060606061 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 411.3 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.2739419677 49.2860985944 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.25 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.91666666667 7.06452816374 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18572729834 0.272083759551 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733464409876 0.0996497079465 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502729751563 0.0662205650399 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120463995291 0.162205337803 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223443026448 0.0443174109184 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.